« Quotes | Main | Alice Marshall Watch- Part 5 »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b13369e200d8346aa84e53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is the GOP Senate Majority in Trouble?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

GOPHokie

There is certainly reason for concern, but I personally do not believe NOVA has turned decidedly democratic like this past election would suggest. I think alot of things came to pass that made everything break for the dems.
I dont think the GOP should be in panic mode yet. If we lose those senate seats though, we may have reason to feel that way.

ZB

Devolites Davis and Cuccinelli are toast. I hope the later is reading this---remember he was talking with such bravado about how Caputo would lose and that Republican elected officials wouldn't cross over against Craddock. He was as wrong about that as he has been wrong-headed in his bigoted voting record.

Mims and O'Brien's seats may be a little harder to take.

I think a Bruce Roemmelt candidacy, should Colgan retire, could give the Democrats a great chance of holding that seat too.

Ray

CHAP! would be a sure winner against Devolites-Davis.

Heh, these Dems sound like the Reps who said we could beat Ward Armstrong, Jackie Stump, Butch Davies, Earl Dickenson Roscoe Reynolds, etc cuz George Allen ran so good there. Folks, people vote the person, not the party.

Liberal_Pi

It seems as though the four seats is a lot for the Democrats to bank on.Though it seems Dems can cound on two seats, they'll need to pick up three downstate to seal the deal. The question is, what downstate seats are vulnerable? On the same token, are there any vulnerable Dem seats?

Steven J Berke

Even before the election, I told friends that if Greg Werkheiser lost to Dave Albo but came close (which of course is what happened), he should, if he was going to run for anything in 2007, aim for the State Senate rather than butt heads with Albo again. This confirms my opinion.

Not Corey Stewart

The Dems won't pick up 5 seats no matter what. Let's see who they recruit before we start changing the official stationairy.

Not Corey Stewart

Devolities-Davis may be in trouble though, as she and Tom don't support real conservatives who won't agree to be part of his corporate machine.

Rtwng Extrmst

I disagree on Devolites-Davis as she will be difficult to beat with Davis behind her. I do not like Davis, but despite what Not Corey says, he supports the Republicans we put forward (including Cuccinelli).

I think O'brien might have more trouble than Cuccinelli. His district crosses much more into blue territory. I hope Obrien does win though.
Cuccinelli is a much more capable campaigner and is good on the stump. Despite ZB's misinformation. He does not have a bigoted voting record, and is only "wrong-headed" if you are a card-carrying liberal like ZB. In the end, the Dems will have to do alot better than Kathy Smith or Stan Barry if they want to unseat Cuccinelli.

The special election could be interesting if Mims moves on. That could be a challenge.

Bottom line, there's alot that goes on between now and NOV 2007, including a Congressional election. Who knows, maybe Tim Kaine will leave the example Mark Warner provided and actually try to do something other than just raise taxes. This could put the Dems back on the defensive. None of these seats are shoe-ins for the Dems. If the Incumbants are not overconfident and run hard races, it will take alot of work for a Dem to useat them.

Oh and one more thing. It will be important for the Republicans to unite behind their incumbants. If they have serious in-party challenges in 2007, this hurts any of these candidates and helps the Dems, no matter what the outcomes of the primaries.

The Ghost of Tom Joad

"Oh and one more thing. It will be important for the Republicans to unite behind their incumbants. If they have serious in-party challenges in 2007, this hurts any of these candidates and helps the Dems, no matter what the outcomes of the primaries."

Like the 67th this year? Wow, at least one Republican learned the lesson!

ZB

Rtwng---I do not carry a card that calls me a liberal. Why is it that just because I think someone sponsoring anti-gay legislation and opposing allowing companies to voluntarily offer health insurance benefits because it might provide that benefit to same-sex couples... and someone who is in the small minority of state legislators who won't even put in writing that he doesn't discriminate PERSONALLY on the basis of sexual orientation that that makes me a liberal?

If believing that companies should be able to offer health insurance to whoever the want even if they are gay or lesbian is "liberal" that makes the following people liberals:

Senators Bell, Blevins, Chichester, Colgan, Devolites Davis, Hawkins, Houck, Norment, Puckett, Quayle, Reynolds, Stolle, and Watkins

Delegates Albo, Bell, Callahan, Hamilton, Hargrove, Joannou, Johnson, Louderback, Marrs, Morgan, O'Bannon, Orrock, Parrish, Petersen, Purkey, Rust, Saxman, Suit, Tata, Wardrup

If being willing to put in writing that you don't discriminate makes you a liberal, add John Warner, George Allen, Jerry Kilgore, and Thelma Drake to the list.

I believe Ken Cuccinelli's record is bigoted. I believe that a lot of non-liberals would agree with me.

But at least you're honest about being a right-wing extremist.

Actually, Delegate Albo co-sponsored HB751.

Cuccinelli would be smarter to NOT RUN in '07...save himself the trouble.

Greg Galligan is running against O'Brien again.

Captain Crunch is running?

SE VA MWC Alum

Actually you are in error. In a 20-20 situation a lt. gov. tiebreak does not equal control. If you remember ten years (Don Beyer was lt. gov) ago that scenario happened a power sharing agreement was put into place. With Bolling as lt. gov the republicans would probably control the majority of committees in a 20-20 situation but not all

VAMWC, no they decided then the Lt. Gov could break the tie. Virgil Goode then announced he would vote with the Republicans if they did tried to use the LG, and forced the power sharing.

God Bless Virgil.

Steven J. Berke

Greg Galligan got swamped by O'Brien in 2003, 58%-42%. He and his campaign did not generate much respect from the people I knew in local Democratic circles. Greg Werkheiser would be a much better candidate; if he decides not to run, Democrats could still do better than Galligan.

SE VA MWC Alum

I think the precedent would carry some weight. As far as Virgil I agree that he is an excellent public servant.

Rtwng Extrmst

Tom,

I am not against party challenges to candidates who have gone against the promises that got them elected (like the 67th). ZTo m knowledge, none of these candidates mentioned above did so. Therefore any party challenge would simply be a waste of time, energy, and money that would better be used against the opposition.

Rtwng Extrmst

ZB,

I fail to see how it is bigoted to oppose the allowance of employees to designate health benefits to individuals without a legal connection to them no matter what sex they are. Marital connection or legal dependents are obviously fair for this provision. However, to call out that same sex or opposite sex partners only should be able to be considered in addition to these is unfair. I would have no problem with companies being allowed to provide health benefits to anyone they want. I suspect Senator Cuccinelli woud agree. However to arbitrarily limit that power to only a single same or opposite sex "partner" is simply unfair. What about someone who wants to live with their best friend in a totally platonic way, or say someone who has a long-term girlfriend as well as a wife, or wants to designate a sister or brother? It seems these kinds of relationships have at least as much significance legally or morally and to limit the law in the way you mention is just stupid. Taking this stance is not bigoted at all.

ZB

Righty--you're missing the point. SB 1338 -- the Dillard/Howell health care bill did EXACTLY what you proposed. It said that companies can offer health insurance benefits to anyone MUTUALLY agreed upon by the employer and employee. That allowed domestic partership benefits. It allowed employers to offer health insurance to their best friend, sister, brother, etc. Cuccinellli opposed it anyway. The reason--he's anti-gay. That is bigoted. Given your reasonable view, you would probably have been one of the many reasonable Republicans who voted for SB 1338. The soon-to-be-former Senator from Fairfax was not.

ZB

Righty--you're missing the point. SB 1338 -- the Dillard/Howell health care bill did EXACTLY what you proposed. It said that companies can offer health insurance benefits to anyone MUTUALLY agreed upon by the employer and employee. That allowed domestic partership benefits. It allowed employers to offer health insurance to their best friend, sister, brother, etc. Cuccinellli opposed it anyway. The reason--he's anti-gay. That is bigoted. Given your reasonable view, you would probably have been one of the many reasonable Republicans who voted for SB 1338. The soon-to-be-former Senator from Fairfax was not.

Rtwng Extrmst

ZB,

While I will have to admit I have not read the details of the bill, I am sure bigotry had nothing to do with Cuccinelli's stance. I know the man personally and I know him to not have a bigoted bone in his body. Now, I am willing to bet there is more to this than you are bringing up.

J. Sarge

NLS,

I'm a little concerned about your methodology. I understand that Byrne is the median Democratic performer in the statewide 2005 races; however, I'm not sure that that necessarily makes her the best proxy for Democratic performance in Senate races. Her NoVa ties probably overstate baseline Democratic performance. Also, the issues at the top of the ticket were most likely driving much of the train (differences in Byrne v. Kaine notwithstanding), especially on issues such as managed growth. Much of that will be neutralized in a state senate race. I think we will see a fairly large "McQuigg effect" in 2007. Local incumbent GOPers will significantly outperform Bolling. That being said, Devolites-Davis could still be in trouble, especially if a strong Democratic wave in 2006 for someone like Webb has the ancillary effect of assisting in a knock-off of Tom Davis, neutering that powerful GOP NoVa money machine. I don't know enough about the other races to make informed predictions.

Ron

I wonder how well the Dems will do in Northern Virginia if they keep raising property taxes 11% per year? When do you think voters reach the breaking point?

ZB

I wonder how well the GOP will do in Northern Virginia if they keep ignoring education and transportation and focusing only on what minority group they can demonize and exclude this week. When do YOU think voters reach the breaking point?

Oh wait... they already have. See Jerry Kilgore, Mychele Brickner, Rita Thompson, Chris Craddock, Michael Menuier, Michael Golden, and Dick Black.

SE VA MWC Alum

The real estate market is cooling off, which should cause property assessments to rise at a slower rate
in the future. this issue will become much less important

Ron

SE VA MWC Alum,

I said taxes, not assessments.

ZB,

As a member of a "minority group" myself, I can assure you that the Republicans have not excluded any. When do you think voters will see through Democratic whining since they don't have any issues?

SE VA MWC Alum

Ron if things in NOVA are anything like anywhere else it is rising assessments that are driving the increases. Down here city councils are actually cutting the tax rates, but taxes are still rising because the assessments are increasng so much more. Much of that money is going to overdue projects and I dont forsee tax rate increases if assessment increases slow to 2-4% annually-which is a very reasonable expectation

ZB

I understand Ron, that you are in the minority of people who actually thought Jerry Kilgore would be a better Governor than Tim Kaine. I have no idea what other minority you are, but I'm glad you haven't felt excluded.

That said, I'm guessing you're not:

1) Gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgendered (the VA GOP has not been so forceful for inclusion there)

2) A day laborer (legally or illegally in the united states)

3) A non-Christian

4) A person with a disability

5) Desperately poor

If I'm wrong, I hope you'll tell me so.

StaunchfromDC

Senator Cuccinelli has had numerous volunteers going door to door all Summer. Their response from their constituents were very receptive too! Cuccinelli has a fundraising advantage and keep in mind that Byrne is from the area so she had a lot of friends in this region.

kyle

ur gay

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

BlogAds

NLS Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Facebook Fan Page

    SiteMeter

    Blog powered by TypePad