It's hard to imagine a special election with bigger consequences then the battle Tuesday between Mick Staton and Mark Herring.
The future of the State Senate is at stake.
As we discussed before, the reason Virginia politics operates as it does now, is the moderate GOP control of the State Senate.
The public count of the Senate is slightly different then this (some Senators will kiss the rear end of the leadership until they are vulnerable, and then oust them), here's what I have as the starting point:
8 Conservative Republicans
16 Moderate "Squish" Republicans
16 Democrats
While there is no chance of a total conservative takeover (20 seats), the key number is whether conservatives can outnumber moderates in the GOP Caucus, and take over the leadership.
Depending on the total number of Republicans, that could require 11, 12 or 13 conservative seats. Staton would be number nine, and the breakdown of the Senate would change to this
Staton Victory
9 Conservative Republicans (Plus 1)
15 Moderate "Squish" Republicans (Minus 1)
16 Democrats
A Herring victory would temporarily squash the conservatives in the Senate, and their hopes of taking over. Herring would increase the number of Democrats to seventeen, and create a legitimate chance of a Democratic Senate takeover in 2007.
Herring Victory
8 Conservative Republicans
15 Moderate "Squish" Republicans (Minus 1)
17 Democrats (Plus 1)
Democrats have a poor record against the moderate GOP of the Senate in the last two decades, only defeating two moderate incumbents GOP Senators(Jane Woods, Robert Calhoun) head to head in the last twenty years. Democrats can only pick up these moderate GOP seats in a special dynamic or when conservatives seize the nomination, as has happened here.
A referendum on total opposite Boards of Supervisors in Loudoun is at stake.
This seat is overwhelmingly in Loudoun County, one of the fastest growing counties in America. The growth issue is what drives local politics. In 1999, Democrats and Independents took over the Board of Supervisors on a "Smart Growth" platform. In 2003, the Republicans took back 6 of 9 seats on a "property rights" platform.
Mark Herring served on 1999-2003 Democratic Board that enacted massive growth restrictions, which were later overturned in court on a technicality (not advertised in time).
Mick Staton came onto the Board as part of the GOP takeover in 2003. He has been a leader in the policies of the new board.
Tim Kaine's Loudoun victory this year, on the growth issue has many observers predicting the old Board now has the upper hand going into 2007. If Staton defeats Herring this momentum towards the old Board would be stuffed.
The upper hand in Loudoun growth issues will have major impacts in growth across the booming D.C. metro area. Even officials in Maryland are watching this special election closely.
A test of recent Democratic momentum is at stake
In each of the seriously contested special elections this year, Democratic candidates ran well ahead of Tim Kaine's performance in their districts.
This district went for Kaine by a larger margin then any of the other special election districts. Republicans must not only blunt Democratic momentum, but flip it to win this election. If Herring runs ahead of Kaine here, Republicans will have some serious soul searching on this years special elections, and what has happened since November.
Tim Kaine's transportation and growth plan is at stake
While each of the special elections have seen Democrats exceed Tim Kaine's percentage in their district, its worth noting that both Democratic victories came before Tim announced his transportation plan, and the loss came afterwords. At the polls in the 97th, I heard voters bringing up this issue as a reason to come out and vote for Peace.
Mick Staton has seized on this issue and is using it as a major difference between him and Herring. A Staton victory would leave the Democrats winless since Kaine announced his plan. That would stiffen the spines of those legislators opposed to the new taxes, and possibly be the deciding factor in the defeat of the plan.
A Herring victory would be seen as taking a traditionally GOP area, and winning it twice (Kaine and then Herring) on the transportation and growth issue. The momentum gained from that win, could be the deciding factor in the passing of Tim's plan.
The 2007 Elections are at stake
With all three Senate factions struggling for position, this election will decide who has the upper hand going into 2007.
A Staton victory would be a disaster for the moderate Republicans (RINO's?) who control the Senate. One of their strongest arguments in 2007 is going to be "if you defeat us the Democrats will take over". Flipping a moderate R seat to a conservative, in a district Tim Kaine won would be devastating to that argument. Mick's victory would likely embolden conservatives to challenge moderate Republicans across the board, making all out nuclear war in the GOP.
A Herring victory would leave Senate Democrats in a remarkable position. Northern Virginia exurbs, all traditionally strong GOP areas would be represented by three Democrats (Colgan, Herring and Houck) and two Republicans (Chichester and Potts). Moderate Republicans looking to hang on to the Chichester and Potts seats would argue that type of Republican is the only kind that can win those Senate seats.
Meanwhile, while Democrats sit waiting, hoping that conservatives take either of those nominations so they can challenge, three other Republicans will be in a terrible position. JeanneMarie Davis, Ken Cuccinelli and Jay O'Brien, will all be sitting in Kaine/Byrne districts. A Herring win will leave them surrounded, with Democrats controlling both inside the beltway districts, and with Herring and Colgan to their west.
One could say that a Herring victory will leave these three GOP Senators looking up like George Custer... surrounded with no where to go. Will a Herring victory make 2007 "Cuccinelli's Last Stand"?
We'll find out on Tuesday.