Projected Winners
Dan Bowling has defeated Shea Cook to become the new Delegate from the 3rd district.
Ryan McDougle has defeated Roger Cavendish to become the new Senator from the 4th District.
« Jan Bowling | Main | Coordinated Democrats Respond »
Dan Bowling has defeated Shea Cook to become the new Delegate from the 3rd district.
Ryan McDougle has defeated Roger Cavendish to become the new Senator from the 4th District.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b13369e200d8346e9e4f53ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Projected Winners:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
I project that Ryan McDougle has defeated Roger Cavendish to become the new Senator from the 4th District.
Posted by: | January 03, 2006 at 03:50 PM
I project USC to beat Texas in the Rose Bowl.
Posted by: | January 03, 2006 at 04:06 PM
The early numbers (29% reporting) seem to indicated that Dan Bowling is gonna win easily.
He's leading in all three jurisdictions.
Posted by: ZB | January 03, 2006 at 07:31 PM
McDougle is going to win easily as well.
Posted by: | January 03, 2006 at 07:36 PM
Cook even got spanked in Tazewell. Looks like about 20% turnout in this race. That sounds awfully high, but I am sure the union presence helped with that (and also helped defeat Cook).
I never had any doubt about McDougle.
Posted by: GOPHokie | January 03, 2006 at 07:43 PM
With 44 of 45 pcts reporting, Bowling won 60.4% to 28.2% (with 9% for Elkins and 2.4% for Wright).
That's gotta be more than just union GOTV. Even in Tazewell, Bowling got 61% to Cook's 32%)-- compare that to the 57%-25% win in Buchanan.
Congrats to Del-Elect Bowling. Funny that on the day that McDougal wins Bollings seat, Bowling wins.
Posted by: ZB | January 03, 2006 at 08:06 PM
You didn't have any doubt about Craddock either
Posted by: demHokie | January 03, 2006 at 08:06 PM
I guess that 100 pound backpack didn't hurt Dan Bowling too much. Congrats to the Delegate-Elect, and the House Democratic Caucus. The Rs put a lot of money into this one, too.
Posted by: 100 lb. back pack | January 03, 2006 at 08:18 PM
The results are here:
http://sbe.vipnet.org/index.htm
For the house race, who is G L Elkins and why did he get over 9% of the vote? When both parties are contesting, it's very rare for an independent to get that high.
For the Senate race, I understand that it's a Republican district, but why did McDougle get over 80% of the vote? That seems extraordinarily high. Was there a problem with Cavendish?
Posted by: Freddie | January 03, 2006 at 08:26 PM
www.elkinsfordelegate.com
Looks like he's pretty active in Buchanan (where he did very well) as the former Soil & Water District Director and as owner of a business.
It seems he was supported by some Buchanan Democrats.
Posted by: ZB | January 03, 2006 at 09:25 PM
Freddie- the percentage was so high for mcdougle because Hanover County is more solidly republican than Utah. That, and you could basically consider McDougle the incumbent in this race- Cavendish never had a chance- the real race will be John Montgomery for McDougle's seat.
Posted by: | January 03, 2006 at 09:56 PM
Jerry Elkins did well because he spent the money. He was the only candidate running tv and radio ads here in my neck of the woods.
To be honest, I was worried that he might do well and pull votes from Dan. Looks like that may have happened, but not enough to matter.
Posted by: Brian Patton | January 03, 2006 at 10:43 PM
Look at the turn out in the Senate race-6% ?
not a real interesting contest, according to the voters.
Posted by: Jerry Gray | January 03, 2006 at 10:57 PM
I searched the web and found the results of Ryan's Election, about 82% of the 6.77% of votes cast (just over 8000 cast). Hanover turn out was about 70% of the total votes cast, and Ryan got 84% of those votes, about the same as across all counties. With Bolling and McDougle’s help, not to mention the experience Peace brings, he can turn out the Republicans in Hanover and the seat will stay Republican.
Posted by: Skillet Head | January 04, 2006 at 09:00 AM
Skillet,
No disrepect to Peace---but just keep in mind that Montgomery is a much more formidable candidate than Cavendish who basically ran as an unfunded, unsupported, sacrificial lamb who just wanted there to be SOME choice on the ballot. This could be a contest.
Posted by: ZB | January 04, 2006 at 09:15 AM
C'mon ZB, who can possibly be against Peace?
I say that we just give Peace a chance.
Everybody now... "all we are saying, is give Peace a chance...."
Posted by: Ken Cuccinelli | January 04, 2006 at 10:50 AM
Ken:
You're fooling yourself if think there will ever be Peace in the Middle New Kent County
Posted by: Virginia Centrist | January 04, 2006 at 11:00 AM
3rd HOD update: Elkins was on TV & radio because the McGlothlins bank rolled him late. They (particularly Mickey) were mad because Mickey lost the primary. According to VPAP.org, there were late contributions to the Elkins campaign in the amount of $17500.
Posted by: abc | January 04, 2006 at 01:31 PM
Why is it so hard to get actual numbers on these races? All I see are percentages. I guess I could do the math since some of the reports provide the total vote, at least on the HD race. But I'm surprised that the preferred convention on reporting this is percentages.
Posted by: NoVA Scout | January 04, 2006 at 04:06 PM
Of course there's always the SBE website for all your election result needs... fairly accurate numbers (the same numbers the campaigns and press get) are available on the website (assuming whomever posts them don't make transcription errors).
www.sbe.state.va.us
Posted by: Dan | January 04, 2006 at 06:00 PM
abc--I believe you are incorrect about contributions to Elkins.
It is not Mickey McGlothlin who made the donations
Posted by: Jerry Gray | January 04, 2006 at 11:14 PM
How is this Mickey McGlothln related to the former delegate and the judge in the coal mine case, and speaking of coal mines God bless those people in WVA
Posted by: SE VA MWC Alum | January 05, 2006 at 10:19 PM
I believe the former delegate and judge is Mickey's uncle.
Posted by: another MWC..not UMW alum | January 06, 2006 at 12:35 PM