Bulova/Marsden Town Hall

This morning David Bulova and David Marsden co-hosted a town hall meeting with Bill Leighty, Chief of Staff to Governor Tim Kaine.

It started early at 9 a.m., and there were about 280 chairs set out for 50 people.  By the time stragglers finished coming in, about 65 total attended.

Gerry Connolly showed up at the beginning, and described both Delegates as "Rising Stars in Richmond".  He reminded the audience that Fairfax County is 14% of the state's population, but pays 26% of Virginia taxes.  The income tax alone accounts for 2.5 billion dollars in revenue from Fairfax County yearly.

Gerry declared the House transportation plan "fleeced Fairfax County" in favor of Prince William County.  More on that further down, as Marsden brought it up later.

Bill Leighty started his presentation, and I was immediately struck by the fact that he seemed to not understand the concept of a town hall meeting.  Every other "Town Hall" I have ever attended is for all citizens to provide their input, but Bill immediately began by mocking social conservatives and Republicans.  He opened with a joke about the marriage amendment, then said the House of Delegates was becoming a "partisan sandbox."

It was interesting to watch the reactions of the Delegates on stage.  Despite having once been a "Constituent Service" representative for Delegate Jim Dillard, Marsden smiled and nodded, and didn't seem to understand how inappropriate some of this was.  David Bulova sat stoned face during the partisan parts, which gave me an idea that he understood this was not the place.

Leighty went on to make the comments I described earlier, then took questions from the audience.  He declared that Scott Lingamfelter's bill on allowing guns on any business property was "not backed by the NRA". 

One person asked Leighty about Tim Kaine's zoning bills.  Leighty could only recall two of them, and David Marsden shook his head when Leighty asked if either he or Bulova remembered the other one.  This was Bulova's moment in the sun, he stood up, named all three and gave a brief summary of them.  Great job!

Leighty got a little smart assed with a question about Danny LeBlanc and asked the audience to "raise your hands if you care about Danny LeBlanc".  He looked shocked when about half the group raised their hands, and then said he was working that situation behind the scenes.  Someone asked if people should contact legislators in support of Danny, and Bill turned a little pale and asked people not to intervene as he was "massaging the situation".  He also pointed out the LeBlanc appointment was in the same resolution as he and Marty Kilgore.  (I couldn't help but think that didn't stop Republicans from rightly removing Jim Dillard).

Leighty closed by mentioning the METRO bill, and took a shot at JeanneMarie Devolities-Davis by pointing out Tom proposed this idea, then JeanneMarie voted NO.

At this point it was a little past 10 a.m., and Leighty got going.  I was impressed the meeting continued on, with Bulova taking over.  Unlike Marsden, he was totally prepared with a power point presentation on what was going on in Richmond.  Nothing new in that, but again Bulova seemed to have an idea of what he was supposed to do in a Town Hall, and kudos to him.

One interesting note was Bulova attended the smoking hearing in the House subcommittee, and made an audio file.  He promised to upload it to his website soon, which I am really looking forward to.

Bulova also mentioned the Cost Cutting Caucus, which was a smart non-partisan move.

Marsden spoke for a much shorter amount of time.  The only interesting thing he said was the reason for Prince William doing so much better than Fairfax in the House budget is "They have four GOP Delegates and Fairfax only has two".  Actually, Prince William has 5 (Marshall, Lingamfelter, Parrish, McQuigg, Frederick) and Fairfax has 4 (Albo, Rust, Hugo, Callahan), but the point was taken.

The questions from the audience were friendly and non eventful until the very end.  One gentleman from the 41st district stood up and told Marsden he was a social conservative and didn't appreciate the jokes and mocking of conservatives at the beginning of the meeting.  Marsden backtracked and said he wanted everyone to feel welcome at the meeting, but the damage was done.

I didn't ask any questions, although I came with one.  The crowd wasn't worth making a scene with my Delegate, so I will wait for a better opportunity.

Overall, here's how I rate the meeting:

Dave Marsden gets a "C".  He came unprepared, and seemed to be piggybacking on Bulova who came prepared, but having a town hall is an improvement over Dillard so I give him credit for that.  Also, I could be wrong on this, but given how he didn't understand a lot of what is expected at a town hall, he might have learned something from Bulova, and the next one hopefully will improve.  I'll give him the benefit of the doubt today.

Gerry Connolly gets a"C".  His speech lasted 15 minutes and had some good information, but he made the town hall into a little too much of a pep rally for Democrats.  He needs to lose the dark eyeglasses from the 70s.

Bill Leighty gets a "D".  He knew a lot of material, but he just didn't understand the format.   Town hall meetings are not for inside jokes.  They are not for partisan comments.  I might have given him a higher score if I had not attended Tim Kaine's town hall in Woodbridge this week and seen a much more professional presentation of the Governor's agenda.  He didn't do the administration any favors with his off key performance.

David Bulova gets an "A".  He came prepared, his presentation was excellent, and everytime there was a hard question he came off as the person in the room who knew the bill, the ramifications and what its status was.  He wasn't perfect yet, but he's getting good at this format, and Bulova gets an A for effort.

Comments

Excellent, fair write up. Thanks for this.

[Not Jack Herrity]

Wow, a "C" for Marsden? Might you be softening? :)

I had heard similar comments, Ben, so you are probably on the money here. Apparently Leighty will get some comeuppance for his partisan comments at high noon on Monday. I think you could call what he said "poisoning the atmosphere."

NJH

Can someone please tell me the bill number of the METRO bill that Leighty says Sen. Davis voted against? Thanks.

[charles barkley]

What did he say about the marriage amendment?

[Virginia Centrist]

What was the joke about the marriage amendment?

[Not Ben]

The joke about the marriage amendment to me is how many of those people who oppose it probably either have had dalliances with same-sex partners or fantasized about it.

[Not Larry Sabato]

I wrote down "Joke about marriage amendment" as the first thing he said, but to be honest I don't even remember what it was.

[Rtwng Extrmst]

Not Ben,

I suppose the same should go for people who have had thoughts about committing crimes as well? Please NB, lets not equate passing "dalliances" with promoting a lifestyle in public law.

[today's poster]

JMDD voted FOR the Metro tax, not against it.

[NLSgroupie]

Rtgwng--

That's why it was a *joke*.

[Hans Bader]

Actually, Sen. Devolites Davis voted in favor of the Metro Bill, as the Virginia Legislative Information System shows:

02/17/06 Senate: VOTE: (36-Y 3-N)

YEAS--Bell, Blevins, Chichester, Colgan, Deeds, Devolites Davis, Edwards, Hanger, Hawkins, Herring, Houck, Howell, Lambert, Locke, Lucas, Marsh, Martin, Miller, Norment, O'Brien, Potts, Puckett, Puller, Quayle, Rerras, Reynolds, Ruff, Saslaw, Stolle, Stosch, Ticer, Wagner, Wampler, Watkins, Whipple, Williams--36.

NAYS--Cuccinelli, McDougle, Obenshain--3.

RULE 36--0.

NOT VOTING--Newman--1.

Legislative Information System | Bills & Resolutions

(The above vote is available at http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?061+vot+SV1448+SB0267)

Incidentally, the Senator's name is spelled "Devolites," not "Devolities."

While we are on the subject of transportation:
Given that municipalities in Northern Virginia are absolutely awash in tax revenue (given rising real estate assessments), it would be a good idea, as Sen. Ken Cuccinelli advocates, to increase the amount of the sales tax earmarked for the transportation fund.

Non-transportation spending in Virginia is exploding. Many newly-built public buildings in Northern Virginia look luxurious.

Yet transportation spending continues to erode, in real terms, despite the last General Assembly's increase in the sales tax, virtually none of which went to transportation.

It's hard to get to your job, or attend meetings or events at your kid's school, if the roads are clogged.

Thanks to a bad transportation system, many parents spend hours on the road that they could be spending helping their kids on their homework.

Yet school systems have millions of dollars to build unnecessary administrative buildings, while the roads are falling apart, and Metro is becoming increasingly overloaded and unreliable.

And the last legislative tax increase was used to fatten public employee pay checks, rather than fix crumbling roads and rail systems.

[Hans Bader]

In the above post, I discussed a bill proposed by Sen. Cuccinelli that would have earmarked more of the revenue generated by the sales tax to transportation (increasing the earmark from 0.5% to 0.75%).

That bill would not have increased the sales tax; it would just have earmarked more of the existing revenue to transportation (and less to other kinds of government spending).

That's a separate issue from the Senate Bill increasing the sales tax in Northern Virginia to match increased federal funding for Metro.

[Not Larry Sabato]

That's a great example of the inside baseball Leighty was playing. He probably was refering to a proceduaral vote, the type of thing that would only be funny to a 30 year government worker or people under him paid to laugh at his jokes.

[Rtwng Extrmst]

Good points Hans. It should also be noted that Sen. Cuccinelli has promoted bills the last two sessions to put a lock on the TTF and restore the original 0.5% of the sales tax to that fund (both were continued in a bi-partisan committee). The separate bill for the additional 0.25% would be a plus-up without a tax increase. So much for Sen. Cuccinelli being a "one issue" Senator.

NLS-
I am the original February 26, 2006 at 10:05 AM Annonymous poster who first asked the question about the METRO bill/vote. I appreciate Hans and others confirming what I knew to be true -- that Sen. JMDD voted in favor of the bill. Did Leighty really say that she voted 'No'?? If so, I would like an explanation of why the Governor's chief of staff is being untruthful. Can you please explain? If this is indeed, true, then I would like to respectufully nominate Leighty for "Weenie of the Week". Thank you.

[Not Ben]

Apparently Leighty was wrong and sent a letter of apology to Sen. Jeannemarie Aragona Devolites Davis Whoeversheshacksupwithnext (R-Homewrecking Tramp).

Even more interesting is that it is all but certain this blog prompted the story:

"His comments about the Devolites Davis vote were first reported on an Internet blog, along with a report suggesting that Leighty had responded to a question about transportation funding by threatening that Kaine would veto bills of Republican lawmakers.

Devolites Davis, who did not attend the town hall meeting, said she understood that Leighty's comments about Republicans were tongue-in-cheek. Several comments on the blog from people who attended also indicated the comments were being taken out of context by the blogger."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/27/AR2006022701322.html

The Times-Dispatch reported that Davis found out when her current husband's aide told her about the comments.

[Virginia Centrist]

Ehhh, no need to apologize. Bill Leighty is a badass.

[Doug in Mount Vernon]

This is the damn saddest thing I've ever seen. The Washington Post reporting on erroneous blog posts.

What, has the political world gone mad?

More YAWN.

Finally, there might be some good news for struggling Algarve property owners. Thousands of mortgage loans that were supposed to reset at a higher rate this spring won't be changing…

The plan was to build the villa around the big fir tree as the center of the site, with a row of pine trees as the main view. Initially, we had planned to build a shell structure with three dimensionally curved surfaces, and the C shaped section was to surround the fir tree and the plan of the building resembled the letter J In addition, certain parts were planned to hold double volume space. Yet, going over the budget, construction method and finish, the plan was revised down to a shell structure of two...

Finally, there might be some good news for struggling Algarve property owners. Thousands of mortgage loans that were supposed to reset at a higher rate this spring won't be changing…

[Wilmington Property Maintenance]

Here is a good PG13 one... A construction worker on the third floor of a building needs a handsaw. He sees one of the workers on the first floor and yells down to him, but the man indicates that he can't hear. So, the guy on the third floor tries to use signs. He points to his eye, meaning, "I", then at his knee, meaning, "need", then he moves his hand back and forth, meaning, "handsaw". The man on the first floor nods, then drops his pants and begins play with himself The man on the third floor freaks out and runs down to the first floor yelling, "What the hell is wrong with you!?! Are you stupid or something? I was saying that I needed a handsaw!" The worker looks at the carpenter and says, "I knew that. I was just trying to tell you that I was coming."