RUMOR CIRCULATING THAT JESSICA THE CAMPAIGN MANAGER IS GOING TO BE DEMOTED TO DEPUTY CAMPAIGN MANAGER
WEBB CONSULTANT STEVE JARDING TO TAKE OVER AS CAMPAIGN MANAGER.
QUESTIONS CIRCULATING ON HOW STEVE CAN DO THE CAMPAIGN WHILE TEACHING CLASSES FIVE DAYS A WEEK AT HARVARD THIS FALL.
DEVELOPING.....
Now you're just fishing you wanker.
Posted by: Greg Bouchillon | June 29, 2006 at 06:41 PM
The Harvard symbol- WAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Posted by: | June 29, 2006 at 06:44 PM
Did Webb fire Jarding?
Posted by: | June 29, 2006 at 06:55 PM
I predict Jessica is fired (again)
Posted by: Roanoker | June 29, 2006 at 06:57 PM
If Jarding goes...Saunders will follow.
Seasoned pros need to be brought in.
Posted by: | June 29, 2006 at 07:05 PM
I really wonder how long it will take Saunders to have his meltdown?
This picture and article say it all...
http://www.raisingkaine.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=3050
Here's the one statement that really sticks out from this interview:"
For [Miller] to accuse of us of anti-Semitism, I take it personal...and I am offended."
Well, Dave, how in the hell do you think that Mr. Miller felt when he saw the cartoon with the hook nose depiction? Don't you think he took it personally.
He did and rightly so.
What a hypocrite!
Here's the bottom-line about Saunders, he is all bluster. He's a bully. He cusses. He threatens. He talks loud and never lets anyone else get a word in edgewise.
But, in the end, bullies always get exposed for being the little people that they really are.
Now that he is going against some seasoned operatives, he'll be stuck with his dick in his hand and wondering what in the hell just happened.
That's the deal.....
Posted by: Lewis Armistead | June 29, 2006 at 07:06 PM
Do they have the men in white coats waiting for Jarding as he leaves?
Posted by: | June 29, 2006 at 07:10 PM
Ah, memories:
http://notlarrysabato.typepad.com/doh/2006/02/james_webb_camp.html
Posted by: | June 29, 2006 at 07:14 PM
Damn, I wonder if Webb fired Jarding?
Posted by: | June 29, 2006 at 07:15 PM
Positive changes in any campaign takes money. Has Webb's finances improved enough lately to be able to affort "A" team consultants and campaign management?
Posted by: winconservative | June 29, 2006 at 07:20 PM
I feel like a dope for asking this, but I will ask. Who is this person with the flying toupee. What happened to the flying toupee Sabato?
Posted by: George Templeton | June 29, 2006 at 07:22 PM
Win,
You bring up a good point regarding the fundraising.
What they really need is a good fundraiser. Let's face it, the candidate has to be willing to make the calls.
Posted by: Lewis Armistead | June 29, 2006 at 07:22 PM
The man with the toupee is one of the two men "behind the curtain." The great Oz himself....Steve Jarding -- the chief political consultant.
Posted by: Lewis Armistead | June 29, 2006 at 07:24 PM
I'll feel like a dope for saying:
Bob Hope.
I'll feel like a moron if I am wrong.
Posted by: | June 29, 2006 at 07:25 PM
Thank you Lewis. I guess it would be too much to assume that Jarding is the subject of this breaking news.
Posted by: George Templeton | June 29, 2006 at 07:27 PM
At this point, who the hell knows? NLS knows. I'm sure he's just waiting to confirm.
Posted by: Lewis Armistead | June 29, 2006 at 07:28 PM
Lewis Armistead is coward with an ax to grind. Maybe he got ticked at Yearly Kos?
Keep whistling Lewis.....
Posted by: | June 29, 2006 at 07:36 PM
A few days after Mudcat and Wadhams were on Hardball, I was at a downtown news conference and I ran into an old college friend who works for one of the political think tanks.
What she said really shocked me: The Webb campaign was telling reporters that they (campaign) did not know that Mudcat was going on Hardball. I said I did not believe that, and I found that accusation just ridiculous.
I phoned a local reporter that afternoon. He was told mixed messages from the Webb campaign about Mudcat's appearance on Hardball. Never good.
While I would like to believe that Mudcat's appearance was probably not the best coordination from the Webb campaign, I also want to believe that the friction within the campaign would resolve quickly.
One thing is for sure: Us Dems know that life is not so great within the Webb campaign, and it is painfully evident that the MSM knows that life is not good within the campaign. They will pounce with print if the campaign becomes too weak to counter.
It is June 29th. We have no more time to mess around. A campaign cannot successfully fundraise if prospective contributors lack confidence in the campaign management. Period.
Posted by: | June 29, 2006 at 07:41 PM
From the campanion thread on this topic:
A couple of obvious suggestions if 50% of this is true:
1. Get some gray hair in charge. Lots of it nearby with lots of experience. Amateur hour is way over if we expect to win.
2. Get over the kool aid primary attitude. The Miller team that we were talking about in February is starting to drift away out of state. Stupid.
The rest is fairly obvious to anyone who has ever run a serious campaign.
And a serious campaign is not one promoting a big effort to reach $100,000 when your opponent has $7mm in the bank, nor thinking that "blogging on Koz right now!" is actually campaigning.
Posted by: Alarmed | June 29, 2006 at 07:49 PM
It's obvious that a shake-up is needed; I just highly doubt that Webb knows enough about campaigning to reallize just how poorly his campaign is being run.
Posted by: Virginia's Right Stuff | June 29, 2006 at 07:54 PM
More rumors about a shakeup? There have been rumors of a shakeup within the Webb campaign for ages. Am I missing something?
Posted by: DemTilDeath | June 29, 2006 at 08:27 PM
Alarmed,
You are RIGHT ON.
Posted by: | June 29, 2006 at 08:28 PM
Well, I was wrong: we've set our sights on another $15k and announced our new goal of reaching $115,000 by tomorrow. That's a couple of days of Allen's current ad buy.
This is as sad as the fact that we are having this discussion:
http://www.webbforsenate.org/blog/node/79
Posted by: Alarmed | June 29, 2006 at 08:43 PM
No more Jarding... Please!!!!
Posted by: | June 29, 2006 at 08:43 PM
http://www.dailypress.com/news/opinion/dp-61831sy0jun29,0,2525935.story?coll=dp-opinion-editorials
Different spin that what our conservative buddies are weaving.
Posted by: | June 29, 2006 at 08:45 PM