I'm hearing Democrats have found a far better candidate in the 51st District, but that candidate won't run unless Jeff Dion drops out. After his landslide defeat in the Supervisor's election- why is Jeff holding the nomination hostage?
Developing...
« Blog Talk Radio | Main | Senator Webb's New Approach to Iraq »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b13369e200d8354599c853ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Will Jeff Dion DROP OUT?:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Scandalous.
Posted by: phriendlyjaime | May 21, 2007 at 11:50 AM
Jeff, don't go away mad. Just go away.
Posted by: | May 21, 2007 at 12:32 PM
Word to that.
Posted by: | May 21, 2007 at 12:45 PM
Some people are so damn cruel. People, y'all let the chips fall where they may and have some decency, respect, and dignity for those involved along the way, please?
Posted by: Doug in Mount Vernon | May 21, 2007 at 12:59 PM
I don't know much about Mr. Dion, but come on... you're saying that he needs to drop out because someone who you think would be better is too afraid to run for office- against someone who, according to you, is incapable of running an effective campaign!? Am I missing something here?
We have a process for this- it's called a primary. If your proposed candidate lacks the desire or ability to fight for the nomination, then they probably shouldn't be running for office in the first place.
Posted by: A Voter | May 21, 2007 at 01:15 PM
Decency and respect are fine, and should be applied to as many situations as possible. But if Democrats want to take back the GA they are going to have to start running better candidates than Jeff Dion, period.
Posted by: JMU Duke | May 21, 2007 at 01:15 PM
...If this other candidate won't run unless Jeff drops out, sounds like they aren't a very motivated candidate to put into office. You try to make a big deal out of all these things, and make people seem manipulative when with a little common sense you could stop whining and find a way around the problem.
Posted by: Aimee | May 21, 2007 at 01:34 PM
actually who ever is thinking that they may want to run HAS to have Jeff Dion drop out at this point. The filing deadline has passed and they could only replace Dion as the Dem nominee if Dion dropped out. So its not about being a pansy, its about being the only way to get on the ballot. Its too late for conventions at this point because the nominees have to be set by 7 PM on June 12th.
Posted by: blue dawg | May 21, 2007 at 01:34 PM
Thanks--that had slipped my mind.
Posted by: Aimee | May 21, 2007 at 01:36 PM
they are still a pansy for not deciding until may that they wanna run though.
Posted by: blue dawg | May 21, 2007 at 01:42 PM
So then this other person was too afraid/uninterested/forgetful to run against Dion within the time alotted by the Democratic party... and so now Dion should step asside for such a person?
Posted by: A Voter | May 21, 2007 at 01:44 PM
Blue Dawg:
The Democrats have already selected a convention as the method of nomination for the 51st district. The filing deadline is tomorrow. So you are incorrect that "the filing deadline has passed and they could only replace Dion as the Dem nominee if Dion dropped out."
Here is the convention call:
http://pwcdems.com/?q=node/130
Posted by: | May 21, 2007 at 01:56 PM
There are quite a few candidates I have come across in the past few years that don't really seem to want to be running, yet ask for support. It really irritates me that these candidates expect to make mistakes in their races and still be able to do what they want with little effort.
Posted by: Aimee | May 21, 2007 at 01:59 PM
Check your facts before you post. As of this moment both candidates are running and there will be a convention.
Posted by: | May 21, 2007 at 02:00 PM
Is anyone else offended by/Does anyone else see the irony in this description of Dion's potential opponent as a "pansy"? ;-)
Posted by: James Young | May 21, 2007 at 03:06 PM
James, you are going to offend the PC police, or as I like to call them, the Republicans in Augusta county. Watch out. Don't use the word retard either.
Posted by: phriendlyjaime | May 21, 2007 at 03:23 PM
So James Young has "pansy" in his google search engine apparently. Care to share your other names for your obsession with all things queer James??
PS: Your tone and dedication is so hot! Got pics?
Posted by: Mr. Perverted | May 21, 2007 at 04:17 PM
"Holding nomination hostage?" That's what you call it when a committed Democrat steps forward to run for an office that no other Democrat was seeking? And they are supposed to drop out if someone else shows interest?
On the other hand, if Ben wanted to run for the House of Delegates and we had a superior candidate like say, Dave Marsden, would we want party leaders to push Ben out of the race? OK, I guess I can see how that would be fair, in that circumstance... But Dion is a much more credible candidate than Ben!
Posted by: Bosses in smoke filled rooms | May 21, 2007 at 09:16 PM
Well, PW Democrats sure know how to pick 'em, I'll give you that.
A poofter cub scout leader v. a sleazy, philandering schmuck divorce lawyer with ugly paralegals.
Posted by: I.Publius | May 22, 2007 at 06:34 AM
Jeff, please withdraw for the sake of the party.
Posted by: | May 23, 2007 at 08:20 AM