« FAIRFAX COUNTY HAS 82 PRECINCTS WITH NO GOP LEGISLATIVE CANDIDATES | Main | Finally, I get some credit! »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b13369e200e3982070838833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Hillary Pulls Away:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Excellent.
Posted by: | August 01, 2007 at 12:47 PM
This is going to be the big non-news story for 6 months. She won the nomination when she declaired. I'd like someone else, but there it is. Now, let's concentrait on the weirdness that will be Rudy and his insane 3rd wife. That's interesting stuff!
Posted by: Doug | August 01, 2007 at 12:49 PM
Oh, and we'd like to know who you would endorse on the R side if you were forced to vote for one in the field.
Posted by: Doug | August 01, 2007 at 12:50 PM
Doug, I like that question and I look forward to Ben's answer. If we have to endure 4 more years of a Republican executive, which candidate could actually be tolerable?
My answer is Ron Paul. He's off the deep-end with his isolationism and libertarianism. However, he solidly rejects the "I-want-to-run-your-life" wing of the Republican party and that's enough for me. He's Goldwater-esque.
Posted by: Pete in Williamsburg | August 01, 2007 at 01:54 PM
Excellent!
Posted by: I.Publius | August 01, 2007 at 02:13 PM
I.Puppies likes him some Hillary.
Posted by: Doug | August 01, 2007 at 02:20 PM
Here's my bumpersticker poll Pete: in the business park where I work: 2 Ron Paul stickers, 1 Warner for president (mine, ha!), and 0 any other so far.
Ron Paul could be the crazy Ross Perot this time around- don't win it? run independent! I really wish we had like 8-10 candidates to vote for and a run off, or a 1, 2, 3 choice ballot. That way we could have Constitution Party, 2 Republicans, 2 Democrats, Libertarian, Green, Mitt Romneyism, Terror Terror Terror Party, etc. all running.
Posted by: Doug | August 01, 2007 at 02:24 PM
Wow, could the WSJ have possibly made that etching look any toothier? It's like a cousin to Mark Warner's pic from the New Yorker.
Posted by: | August 01, 2007 at 02:38 PM
These national polls make these media outlets look so darn cute. No matter how many times it's explained to them, they never learn that national polls mean nothing in an open-seat presidential primary.
Posted by: brimur | August 01, 2007 at 02:45 PM
Doug, you're so cute when you try to be cute. Not as cute as puppies, but infantile, nonetheless.
Posted by: I.Publius | August 01, 2007 at 02:53 PM
Thanks I'm.Plastered! You're so ok in my book, even if you love Hil. Rupert likes a little Hil on the side too, so it's all good.
Go Spiders!
Posted by: Doug | August 01, 2007 at 02:56 PM
Big time*
*never mind that Obama is leading in South Carolina and tied in N.H.
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2007/07/31/new_polls_iowa_new_hampshire_south_carolina.html
Posted by: | August 01, 2007 at 08:22 PM
Looks like your endorsement had a big effect...
Posted by: | August 02, 2007 at 12:14 AM
A national primary poll.
How unbelievably useless...
Posted by: Ben Kyber | August 02, 2007 at 05:56 PM