See here and here.
I wouldn't say anything if the Mark Warner story had not been so outrageous. He was literally having his staff compile numbers on a statewide Senate bid in a Presidential year (trends, turnout etc.) because it is so different than running in an off year election- when that blog post was put up. That's the most frustrating part of the blogosphere- please don't report stuff if your source isn't good.
You mean kind of like when you had that post up about how the DPVA doesn't report its website expense to the FEC and then we all pointed out the date and line item number on the FEC report that clearly itemized the expense? Are we talking that kind of bad source?
Posted by: | August 31, 2007 at 03:06 PM
Ben, it appears you are you still ticked at Vivian over Chap! and Truro...
Posted by: Bwana | August 31, 2007 at 03:09 PM
Anon 3:06
LOL...too bad NLS won't have the guts to admit he blew that one.
Posted by: | August 31, 2007 at 03:48 PM
"please don't report stuff if your source isn't good."
pot kettle black
Posted by: Alice | August 31, 2007 at 04:44 PM
Bwana- Correct.
Posted by: Not Larry Sabato | August 31, 2007 at 05:00 PM
Ben, did you just delete a comment because I linked to two of your mistakes. WOW
Posted by: | August 31, 2007 at 05:04 PM
Best line I've heard all day.
Good Sources. HAHAHA!
Posted by: | August 31, 2007 at 05:05 PM
10-4, dude!
Posted by: bwana | August 31, 2007 at 05:26 PM
This is before irony was discovered.
Posted by: Interested Observer | September 01, 2007 at 07:53 AM
You can't be serious. Those posts you link to are from Feb. and Dec. Uh, maybe some things have changed in the past six months?
Really, your post is beyond misleading. It's downright ridiculous.
Posted by: | September 02, 2007 at 12:07 AM