« Hot Or Not? | Main | MAJOR CONNOLLY SCANDAL »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b13369e200e54fb0f2c58834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference FRANK WOLF'S OUTRAGEOUS EARMARK:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
How can RK have "the scoop" along with RTD when RK is *citing* RTD? That's moronic.
Posted by: I.Publius | December 10, 2007 at 08:08 AM
Actually, Farewell Frank (http://farewellfrank.blogspot.com/2007/08/frank-wolf-and-morality-police.html) wrote about this back on August 12.
Posted by: | December 10, 2007 at 08:09 AM
Where can I contact this Mr. Wolf? While I'm at it, I might as well get paid.
Posted by: | December 10, 2007 at 09:41 AM
If stuff is the same petty rock-throwing like we saw in 06, Wolf will be in for a much easier campaign. Wolf's base supporters and even independants will probably not oppose this earmark. This type of opposition would go well in San Fransisco were Feder would be better off running not Virginia.
I really cannot believe Feder is wasting her time once again. Can't democrats in the 10th nicely tell her to move and run in Moran's district when he retires or quits? Feder is the exact opposite of the type of democrat needed to beat someone like Wolf. I don't know why anyone would waste time with her.
Posted by: | December 10, 2007 at 09:44 AM
Anon 9:44 AM: Rep. Wolf, don't you have some legislation to be working on or some porn to be looking at or something?
Posted by: | December 10, 2007 at 09:48 AM
Since Wolf is apparently attempting to police morality, does that mean Feder is the anti-morality police candidate?
Posted by: | December 10, 2007 at 09:50 AM
Anon 9:48: Your brother/sister Anon 9:44 makes sense. If you bang your head against a brick wall 17 times and all you get is a concussion, do you think on the 18th time the wall is going to fall down?
Posted by: dems4dems | December 10, 2007 at 11:02 AM
Not only is it absurd to call this a scoop for Raising Kaine when they cite the Richmond Times Dispatch, it's absurd to call this a scoop for the RTD because it's been talked about extensively elsewhere in the media because of the focus on earmark reform. There is no scoop here.
Posted by: WMTribe | December 10, 2007 at 11:03 AM
I see that Feder has recieved a crucial endorsement from Bruce Roemelt. Seriously that is too funny. Feder is from the Roemelt, Rishell, Day wing of the party that gets absolutely obliterated in general elections. Feder could really hurt Mark Warner if for some reason Gilmore gets closer.
Posted by: | December 10, 2007 at 11:09 AM
Hey Dan Scandling, quit posting on blogs!
Posted by: | December 10, 2007 at 12:39 PM
While this can be construed as just two guys being paid to cruise the internet, I believe the intent is to find those insidieous pieces of crap that use the internet to find and lure young people into sex acts. If you believe this is wrong to find these people, then you would object to these tactics. Myself, if we can discover those that are preying on the naive and innocent then I say this is money well spent.
Posted by: Tired of Good Ole Boys & Girls | December 11, 2007 at 10:12 AM