« Democrats Continue To Hammer Bob McDonnell's Race Baiting |
| "LET THEM EAT CAKE" »
April 07, 2009 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b13369e201156f06d8c0970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Rachel Maddow Says Goodbye to Jeff Frederick:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The Post claims JEff Frederick is saying he might run for chairman again! Poor, poor GOP. Queue croc tears.
Two lines of questioning about Jeff Frederick that have been bothering me. Does anyone know the answer to them?
1) He claims to be Hispanic. Jeffrey M. Frederick. Sounds pretty WASP-y. Did he change his name? Was he adopted? What's up with that?
2) He served for what appears to be a year in the USNR, according to his delegate page. How do you serve one year? That's short. How come only one year?
Two questions I have about Jeff Frederick |
April 07, 2009 at 02:49 PM
1) The mother or Father is is Peruvian if memory serves. Helps when you want to claim that dis-advantaged minority preference when you become a government contractor.
2) Last I hear he dropped for medical reasons. Someone should really demand to have his 201 file released.
Doesn't Matter |
April 07, 2009 at 03:19 PM
I actually think he is Colombian, as he went on a tirade last year about gas prices, Chavez and the FARC-even referencing family members being kidnapped by the FARC--all during the morning hour in the 2007 session. It seems to be a recent turn of events that he is referencing his heritage, as his HOD bio on the state site does not list his race but does acknowledge his association with the Hispanic Business Roundtable and the Republican National Hispanic Assembly.
One answer |
April 07, 2009 at 03:54 PM
Ms. Maddow knows her stuff, but she is deadly dull. I wonder where she gets the idea that she is clever. We couldn't get a second hour of Olbermann?
April 07, 2009 at 04:17 PM
Sure would be nice if she at least a couple of facts right. About the only thing she got right is Jeffrey Frederick is no longer party chair
April 07, 2009 at 04:43 PM
"Someone should really demand to have his 201 file released. "
Could they also ask for Obambi's birth certificate so we could tell if he is actually a US citizen?
April 07, 2009 at 08:50 PM
Jeff Frederick is not a veteran. Ask him how long he was on actually active duty? Ask him why he didn’t stay?
April 07, 2009 at 09:29 PM
Because he's a pansy?
Loudoun Insider |
April 07, 2009 at 11:18 PM
Change... ASKED AND ANSWERED -- OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS BONIFIDE and you are a fraud for continuing to peddle that nativist conspiracy theory tripe -- which reflects your adamant refusal to acknowledge the will of the American public.
April 08, 2009 at 12:39 AM
I thought the segment was pretty funny although wasn't the comment that 6 Chairs had been fired in the past 6 years a mistake? Frederick was fired. I guess you could say Hager was "fired" since he didn't win reelection. But at least three others resigned. One of them (Thomson?) probably would have been fired as a result of the eavesdropping scandal.
April 08, 2009 at 08:48 AM
Can someone please tell me who the SIX RPV Chairmen that were fired were?
As usual, liberals have no interest in the truth.
April 08, 2009 at 09:02 AM
BTW, Maddow is boring and impossible to watch. Horrible.
Loudoun Insider |
April 08, 2009 at 09:36 AM
I want to root for her, too, but she's a dud. Olbermann and Matthews do it just fine.
Pete in Williamsburg |
April 08, 2009 at 03:13 PM
Anybody who has read anything I've written on Too Conservative or elsewhere knows I'm no fan of Jeff Frederick.
That being said, Maddow's little segment was a horrendously poor review of the facts, and we haven't removed 6 of our last Chairmen. Two of them resigned voluntarily (Obenshain and Gillespie) and Hager was defeated.
Maddow needs to spend more time checking her facts. I know it's fun to be snarky, but it's more fun to be snarky and be right.
Brian W. Schoeneman |
April 08, 2009 at 06:25 PM
He's a veteran in the sense that he's got 180 contunious active duty service. When I was in the reserves they would give you 179 day orders, a day off and then another 179 days to avoid that.
I would not be shocked if he was either tossed because they eventually figured out he's not excactly office and gentleman material. Either that or he counted until he had his 180 days and then wiggled out of the contract.
Again, if he's going to claim he's a veteran when he's running for things then we have the right to demand his record.
Doesn't Matter |
April 08, 2009 at 09:54 PM
maddow is clueless and speaks only to the mindless lemmings wandering aimlessly in search of validation of their own distorted truth. Anybody who listens to this goofy chick lacks the ability to think independently and should be summarily dismissed.
April 08, 2009 at 09:59 PM
Rachel Maddow is vile.
April 08, 2009 at 10:28 PM
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
(URLs automatically linked.)
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Name is required to post a comment
Please enter a valid email address