« Bill Bolling Puts An End To The 2010 Session | Main | Calm Down People, It Was All "Hypothetical" »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b13369e20120a93b1545970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference COOCH GONE WILD:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Gretchen Laskas

My husband has to travel to Ciudad Juarez pretty often, so I take the shootings of two Americans (and THOUSANDS of Mexicans) very, very seriously. To see these shooting brought up to make a cheap political point really bothers me. Especially when considering that Calderon's aggressive and military response is one that was designed and implemented with the help of the BUSH administration.

jbjd

Surely by now, AG Cuccinelli knows that in the Commonwealth of Virginia, all candidates whose names the state prints on the ballot must be eligible for the job; that members of the D Corporation swore to the Board of Elections Barack Obama was Constitutionally eligible to be President; and that members of the D Corporation have been unwilling to disclose on what documentary basis they ascertained this eligibility. Mr. Cuccinelli must also know that his office has received several citizen complaints of election fraud against members of the D Corporation for such false swearing without ascertaining beforehand whether the facts sworn were true. At this point, he should know, he can determine whether Mr. Obama was born in the U.S.A., without a birth certificate. Here's how.

Nancy Pelosi, Chair of the 2008 DNC Services Corporation Convention not only signed the D Corporation eligibility Certification for Barack Obama but also delivered this to Virginia election officials. Given the overwhelmingly strong circumstantial evidence presented in these citizen complaints, that all of these D Certifications of Barack Obama's eligibility for President are a lie - ha, even current White House Counsel Bob Bauer, asking a federal court in Hollister to take judicial notice his client, Defendant Barack Obama, was eligible to be President, did not refer the court to any of these D Certifications, let alone produce a Certified copy of any of the actual Certifications submitted to state election officials in several states, including Virginia - Cuccinelli can simply ask Ms. Pelosi this question: "On what documentary basis did you ascertain Barack Obama was Constitutionally eligible to be President before you swore to the Commonwealth of Virginia Board of Elections, he was qualified for the job?" (See Virginia citizen complaint of election fraud to AG Cuccinelli, posted in the sidebar on my blog, http://jbjd.wordpress.com )

Dan

Wow, jbjd! Ken should jump right on this. He should make it the top priority of the AG's office.

(Psst. He does understand that Obama isn't white doesn't he?)

Maybe he could hire Orly Taitz as a special prosecutor to assist with looking into these citizen complaints. I'm sure she would be more than happy to help. Especially now that the appeal of those pesky sanctions is over.

I can't think of a more appropriate attorney to help the AG with this. Her legal work is about as serious as the issue involved.

helen

Dan, your blindness is revealing as are so many others who posted nonsense responses.

jbjd is correct. There is only one question the AG needs to ask and jbjd expressed it well "On what documentary basis did you ascertain Barack Obama was Constitutionally eligible to be President before you swore to the Commonwealth of Virginia Board of Elections, he was qualified for the job?"

I was a devoted Dem and left the Party on May 31, 2008 following the theft of Hillary Clinton's delegates by the D Corporation's Rules & Bylaws Committee. Google Harold Ickes and watch his response to the theft.

The biggest secret the D's are keeping from their brethren is millions of us former D's left the Party in 2008. We left because we witnessed and have testified to countless acts of election fraud perpetrated by Obama AND the D Corporation. We have no intention of returning.

Instead of cynicism and ridicule try some self educating for a change. jbjd has worked since the primary to stop the fraud and then to expose the fraud. Her posts tell the entire story. But if you prefer to only go to blogs that serve as echo chambers then you are in for one helluva whack upside your head and deservedly so.

Btw, my name is Helen Tansey and am the proprietor of The T-Room blog at www.t-room.us

jbjd

Ah, let the misdirection begin.

Dan @1:43 PM ostensibly responds to my comment posted @1:17, using my moniker in the first line, of his. But looks are deceiving. See, my comments describe citizen complaints of election fraud filed by Virginians based on the refusal of members of the D Corporation to disclose on what documentary basis they ascertained BO was a NBC. And Dan's comeback is 1) Barack Obama is not white; and 2) Orly Taitz appealed court sanctions.

Now, to repeat my question, which Dan has failed to address: On what documentary basis did Nancy Pelosi, Chair of the 2008 DNC Services Corporation Convention ascertain Barack Obama was Constitutionally eligible to be President before she swore to the Commonwealth of Virginia Board of Elections, he was qualified for the job?

Bob

helen-

Millions of you left, yet PRESIDENT Obama (sorry to rub it in, but deal with it) got more votes than any other Presidential candidate in American history, by a lot. "Millions" seems a lot more like "dozens" to me....

Dan

jbjd and helen, please don't misunderstand me. I fully support your efforts to get AG Cuccinelli to make this a priority. And judging by his early actions in office I think you have a decent chance to get him to do so.

I will go further to say that you should judge him by whether he does this or not. Please hold him accountable over whether he pursues this or not.

helen, I think you may want to speak with Secretary Clinton about your views on the nomination process. She does not share your views. And she made that abundantly and publicly clear. She made clear to her supporters (the ones who were listening) what she wanted them to do going forward. The administrator of this blog was one of her strongest supporters. He heard her and did what she requested. You must have missed her very clear statement. Or you chose not to give her the same respect.

I am quite familiar with Harold Ickes and the statements he made when advocating that position while he was fighting tooth and nail to help Clinton win the nomination. Are you familiar with how equally forcefully he advocated for precisely the opposite position as a member of the DNC before he was on the Clinton campaign payroll?

I don't point this inconsistency out to be critical of Mr. Ickes. He was advocating for his candidate when he completely contradicted his previous position. I would sure want him on my side in a political fight. He is tough.

I point out his previous position in case you are unaware of it. I would like to assume you are unaware of it rather than that you cherry pick facts to cling to a view of the 2008 nomination fight that even your preferred candidate does not hold.

LAD

Born to a British subject father, Obama was a Natural Born British Subject. Period.

His U.S. citizenship at birth was due him, by law, under either 8 USC 1401 or 1409. However, a citizen-at-birth is not a 'natural born citizen.'

Article II describes how a native-born British subject is eligible to be president. He had to be 'naturalized' a U.S. citizen by the adoption of the U.S. constitution.

After the 'time of adoption,' an American-born British subject only gained citizenship as an adult through legal domicile, or the 14th Amendment. These U.S. native-born citizens were not 'natural born citizens' due to their British nationality from the father.

Test: After 8 years of bloody war, would the founding fathers permit a British subject to the presidency? Even if his mother was a U.S. citizen? Even if he was born on U.S. soil?

The answer is obvious . . . NO.

jbjd

Dan @2:37, your comment conflates the conduct of a political party – the D Corporation – with our Constitutional Republic.

The Founders failed to include ‘political parties’ in the Constitution, evidencing they found this construct was immaterial to the creation and maintenance of our Constitutional Republic. And several prominent thinkers of the time warned of the potential danger inherent in special interests gathered together in these cliques, to undermine the whole experiment.

Granted, this potential harm could never have materialized had we been on our toes. But, unfortunately, over time, we failed to appreciate that, the primary mission of political parties, or clubs; is to get the state to print the names of club candidates on the ballot. Or that these clubs in no way supplant the statutory or constitutional (state and federal) mandates required of the candidates affiliated with those parties, once these candidates become holders of these statutory and Constitutional offices.

Comments like yours implicitly ask us to relinquish the authority to govern ourselves, deferring instead to the request of a member of the club that we go along with the club’s internal machinations notwithstanding the adverse impact we believe such acquiescence inflicts on the sanctity of our electoral process. Such inability to distinguish the difference between constructed interests, like club affiliation or loyalty, on the one hand; and inherent powers, like overseeing the integrity of the ballot, on the other; has robbed us of our popular authority. And all public power thus lost has inured to the benefit of those private special interests.

Whether any criticism of members of the D Club can be said to be consistent; or whether favored D’s would have us follow their recommendations; or whether we choose to follow these recommendations; is irrelevant to a complaint that members of this club have abused our electoral process, fraudulently obtaining the official imprimatur of the state on their internal party shenanigans.

Allowing the D Corporation continued access to our state ballots, given their refusal to produce requested documentation that was the basis for their Certification to state election officials that BO was Constitutionally qualified for the job of POTUS to get these officials to print his name next to the D on the state ballot; or re-electing any of the A’sG in applicable states who have refused to investigate the resulting charges of election fraud; reflects poorly on us as fiduciaries of this Constitutional Republic, and not so much on those political parties we feel have done us wrong.

Please, next time, address the question.

Dan

jbjd, it is highly ironic that you should close your remarks with:

"Please, next time, address the question."

since your rather lengthy remarks responding to my 2:37 comment had almost nothing to do with anything I had written.

We may have a substantial area of agreement about the stranglehold that the two major parties have over ballot access under the election laws in all fifty states. Personally I would like to see an easier road available to those who might like to attempt to build a new national party and get its candidates on the ballot.

While you may abhor the place political parties have come to play in our Republic I would suggest that that horse left the barn long ago. Before the dawn of the 19th century. By the time of the election of our second president, John Adams, political parties were playing a major role in the process.

Of course, none of that has a thing to do with what I was talking about. I was addressing the problem Helen had with the enforcement of the internal rules of a political party of which she had voluntarily chosen to become a member. Which in no way conflicts with constitutional government. It has only to do with the selection of that party's candidate.

The mere fact that Helen wanted the rules to be changed retroactively in order to award the nomination to a candidate she favored and that the relevant party committee properly enforced the rules as written and known to all candidates well before the campaign began hardly can be construed as contributing to "election fraud" as your fanciful theories would have it.

You are welcome to all the crazy theories you like about the place of birth of the president or that he was somehow not eligible to be on the ballot by virtue of heaven knows what. I am sure nothing anyone could ever say would dissuade you. Conspiracy theorists rarely accept anything that doesn't support the conspiracy theory.

I would simply point out that the opposition Republican Party, which has shown no hesitation to litigate over election results, has not pursued any of your rather interesting legal theories. If there was anything remotely plausible in them I suspect they would have acted upon them long ago.

jbjd

Dan @9:50PM, I will grant that all of the allegations you make in this comment are true. Okay, now that that's settled, back to the pertinent question, which still has no response.

Given that Virginia election law only allows the names of eligible candidates to appear on the ballot; and given that Nancy Pelosi, Chair of the 2008 DNC Convention swore in the official DNC Certification of Barack Obama's Nomination she sent to Virginia election officials that he was an eligible candidate for President; and given that based on Ms. Pelosi's Certification, these election officials printed the name Barack Obama on Virginia's 2008 general election ballot; on what documentary basis did Ms. Pelosi ascertain Mr. Obama is a NBC BEFORE signing and forwarding this Certification? (FYI, several citizens have already asked but Ms. Pelosi (and Alice Germond, Secretary of the D Corporation and co-signer of that Certification) refuses to answer the question. Have you read the citizen complaint of election fraud to AG Cuccinelli? It's all in there. http://jbjd.wordpress.com )

Dan

jbjd, I guess I am faced with the choice of either accepting that the folks at the State Board of Elections did their jobs properly (which they have an admirable and lengthy history of doing) or accepting the validity of the conspiracy du jour of folks who are unhappy that Obama was elected president and who produce an endless stream of new justifications for their contention that he is not the "legitimate" president. Given that choice I am going to pick the folks at the SBE every time.

I suspect that Cuccinelli will not be aggressively pursuing this latest in a line of such things. But I suspect that won't deter you and your cohorts. You will spin a new tale to "prove" he is not the "legitimate" president. Check your wall. There are many things sliding down, but nothing is sticking.

Here is a novel idea. If you are unhappy with the result of the last election, roll up your sleeves and try to defeat him in the election in 2012. It isn't as much fun as making stuff up but it is far more effective than what you are doing now. And far more honest too.

That is one of the wonderful things about democracy. There is always another election.

jbjd

Dan @ 9:08AM writes,

"jbjd, I guess I am faced with the choice of either accepting that the folks at the State Board of Elections did their jobs properly (which they have an admirable and lengthy history of doing) or accepting the validity of the conspiracy du jour of folks who are unhappy that Obama was elected president and who produce an endless stream of new justifications for their contention that he is not the "legitimate" president. Given that choice I am going to pick the folks at the SBE every time."

Dan, straw dogs. No VA law requires the BoE to vet the Presidential nominee from the major political party as to qualifications for the job, even though VA law only allows the names of eligible candidates to be printed on the ballot. The law only requires the party to pick its candidate according to party rules. (§ 24.2-525. Persons entitled to have name printed on ballot.) And D party rules require the nominee for POTUS to be Constitutionally eligible for the job. (All of this is in the citizen complaint.)

"I suspect that Cuccinelli will not be aggressively pursuing this latest in a line of such things. But I suspect that won't deter you and your cohorts. You will spin a new tale to "prove" he is not the "legitimate" president. Check your wall. There are many things sliding down, but nothing is sticking."

I cannot say for certain why these efforts of activist citizens to comprehend OUR laws; to carry out OUR laws; and to compel OUR elected officials to investigate violations of OUR laws arouses such disdain and ridicule.

"Here is a novel idea. If you are unhappy with the result of the last election, roll up your sleeves and try to defeat him in the election in 2012. It isn't as much fun as making stuff up but it is far more effective than what you are doing now. And far more honest too."

Citizens like me, who believe the integrity of our electoral process has been undermined have the legal right to redress such violations of process. If our charges are correct then, a crime has been committed. And if we cannot utilize EXISTING laws to right that wrong; or if we cannot persuade CURRENT officials to do their jobs then, what difference does it make to enact NEW laws, or elect NEW officials? The issue is not which candidate holds office but what means were used to achieve this result.

"That is one of the wonderful things about democracy. There is always another election."

More straw dogs. People with a good faith well-documented belief that election fraud has occurred are willing to subject ourselves to public scorn from others, like you, so as to preserve our democracy, and not to preserve the selection of any one candidate versus another.

Given your apparent certainty that DNC Chair Nancy Pelosi had a documentary basis for issuing that Certification of Nomination, please, ask her what that was.

P.S. I wish you would ask yourself this question. Why, 5 (five) months after Ms. Pelosi issued that Certification, which persuaded election officials in applicable states that Mr. Obama was Constitutionally eligible to be President; was the "best evidence" Attorney Bob Bauer offered up to establish his client's eligibility, only his word that, the Defendant had publicly released his birth certificate? And why did Attorney Bauer not hand over one of Ms. Pelosi's formal sworn Certifications of his Nomination, when this sworn document persuaded VA BoE officials he was Constitutionally qualified to get his name printed on the ballot?

Dan

jbjd, if you believe the law has been violated then you should of course feel free to pursue it. I suspect you will get about as far as the merits of your case warrant. Which is to say, not very far.

You have a Virginia AG who has demonstrated that he will pander to folks who persist in promoting the long discredited notion that the president was born in Kenya and who has stated his intention to file suit against the federal government over the health care bill. But even he is highly unlikely to take up your rather questionable cause. He hopes to have a political future and he is smart enough to back up before making himself appear too foolish.

It is a small point, but you refer to Nancy Pelosi as "DNC Chair Nancy Pelosi". She has never been the DNC Chair.

There is a place for making arguments that are purely political. And that is not in the courts. As a federal judge in Georgia (a Bush appointee) said when he sanctioned Orly Taitz for her antics it isn't proper to use "the courts as a platform for a political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action." The 11th Circuit denied her appeal of those sanctions.

I don't look for Cuccinelli to go into court to blather on about weird birther theories and that the president isn't really the president anytime soon. It is one thing to pander to a group of birthers by indicating you think their theories are plausible. It is another matter to waste a judge's time with crank political diatribes in his courtroom. Whatever else one may think of the AG, he is not a dope.

www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkYqVwrKwZRlpD2yAerf60smeBA4DpEeUc

Will someone call Andrew's mother and tell her that Sonny has gone off his meds again?

jbjd

Dan @3:32PM, more straw dogs. Only the Attorney General has the statutory authority to seek a criminal indictment. Election fraud here is a criminal offense. Citizens in applicable states, that is, states in which these citizens have already enacted laws requiring only the names of eligible candidates to be printed on their ballots; are merely reporting a crime to the chief law enforcement official in the state.

I am so sorry; of course, Nancy Pelosi was never Chair of the DNC. She was Chair of the 2008 DNC Convention.

Dan, given that no provision of any law, state or federal, requires any public official to determine whether the candidate for President from a major political party is a NBC; and that no provision of the Constitution requires the Electors (now chosen exclusively by the political party) to vet whether the party nominee is a NBC (or even to vote only for a NBC); and given your expressed disdain for attempts to enforce current laws mandating ballot access only to eligible candidates; can you propose a means by which we can ensure our Presidents are qualified under Article II, section 1 of the U.S. Constitution?

jbjd

I disagree with AG Cuccinelli's analysis that if Obama is not a NBC then, he is not President; and any bill he signs is unlawful. The Electors elected him; the Congress ratified the vote of the Electors; and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court swore him into office. All prescribed by the Constitution. (This also means, he can only be removed from office through Articles of Impeachment.)

Marie

The other issue is that in order to go to the Indonesia school that BHO attended as a child, citizenship to the US needed to be reneged upon. This fact would invalidate his eligibility for president. There are 2 different schools of thought. But the bottom line in all this is for whatever reason he has paid over a million in legal costs to not produce a birth certificate. Why????

sildenafil citrate

I was dreaming. I was in a luxury hotel in Europe. I was at a scientific conference giving a speach on evolutionary psychology. I was speaking very passionately about the subject. I woke up and bounded out of bed still almost ranting passionately. At that moment I looked down on the floor and say an anule lizard (the lizard had gotten into my house from a hole caused by Katrina-I let the lizard stay because it scared away the roaches). The lizard seemed to be listening to my rant very intendly, very adoringly, almost as if worshiping me. I said to the lizard "You know what I mean don't you lizard. You come from a long line of ancestors that bares out what I'm saying". The lizard looked at me and seemed to say "Yes brother, I know what you mean. We're strong, we're fit. we will endure."

generic cialis

The state authorities will fine me for having expired product anywhere
in my practice unless it is obviously in the process of being
discarded. The state licensing board will reprimand and fine me if I
use expired product; they have the right to impose other penalties as
well, including suspension. Both of these situations even apply to
autoclaved (sterilised) instruments.

sildenafil citrate

When people talk about the cost of housing, often the only thing people talk about is the actual cost of the home they intend to buy. And often, one thing that many people note when they buy a home in one of the distant suburbs is that they can "get more home for the money" in a distant suburb vs living closer in.

What people don't usually count in the cost of owning a home is the higher transportation costs that are incurred when people live further away from jobs and entertainment options.

viagra online

It was announced in July 2009 that the Flemish dredging company Jan De Nul, together with a consortium of contractors consisting of the Spanish Sacyr Vallehermoso, the Italian Impregilo and the Panamanian company Cusa, had been awarded the contract to build the six new locks.

kamagra

I really hate those littles insects, they are so nosy and difficult to kill.

buy cialis

this day i was looking for on this topic all day. your blog looks really interesting for me what I want to congratulate all the information and the work I do on his blog. thanks again, good job

free dental care

in my opinion perhaps born in kenya but lived all their lives on American soil, then I see no point because things are not important as health or the economy!

top online poker rooms

This guy is great

Nursing tank

oh my..nice video footage.. interesting!!

buy viagra

What a great mornin'...
Hello!!! how you doing!? hope you're fine!! This blog is just amazing, i believe you're talking right about everything in your blog!!!
Guess you're very clever to see the things in that way, you make my day.....
Have a nice day!!!

Áron Berki
4943 Hidden Pond Road
Nashville, TN 37212

Send flowers to china

I love when I have the opportunity to read blogs as interesting as this. really thanks and congratulations.

frank jones

I don't know if he was born in Hawaii or Kenya or somewhere else - and neither do you. How would I know? How do you know? My son has to show his birth certificate to play junior soccer, but we don't ask the President of the United States to prove he is a citizen and to show his birth certificate? I don't get it

phone number lookup

I have heard strange things about this but does not sound like anyone is making an effort.

John

GOP Freak Show.. The GOP has gone off the deep end!

buy viagra

The absurd situation has turned out

cheap jewelry

Thanks for your share,thanks a lot.Good luck!

replica jewelry

Thanks for your share,thanks a lot.Good luck!

Jerelwilmore

The panicked response to this story speaks volumes: even partisans of the right understand that this makes Cuccinelli un-electable.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

BlogAds

NLS Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Facebook Fan Page

    SiteMeter

    Blog powered by Typepad