My message to the WaPo on the Dave Weigel "controversy"...
GO F**K YOURSELVES.
« DEAL WITH IT!!! | Main | "The Stench" »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b13369e2013484ee2598970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference On The Topic of Dave Weigel:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
I love the first comment on this story at Fishbowl DC.
"Its ok, Petraeus has agreed to step in."
Posted by: Dan | June 25, 2010 at 02:58 PM
It's pathetic that someone would out Weigel for expressing an opinion plenty of folks have expressed over the years, publicly and privately.
Posted by: Brian W. Schoeneman | June 25, 2010 at 03:01 PM
Dave made the mistake of telling the unvarnished truth!
Posted by: TomPaine | June 25, 2010 at 03:09 PM
Ha. Another snot-nosed hack blogger joins the unemployment line.
Cheer up Dave, I hear Al Gore pays well for a happy ending.
Posted by: Haywood Jablomi | June 25, 2010 at 04:41 PM
So why should anyone care? What a bore.
Posted by: Jim Webster | June 25, 2010 at 05:11 PM
Weigel is an okay guy, he is not really a friend to the left but his reporting on the fringe within the conservative movement is a valuable source of well researched information.
Who ever leaked these e-mails has broken the security and integrity of the list they came from.
That "journalist" should be strung up and quartered in the public square.
Posted by: Spock | June 25, 2010 at 06:28 PM
Spock - non journalists don't get that treatment, so why should Weigel?
Posted by: haha | June 25, 2010 at 06:30 PM
I am not saying that Weigel should be quartered, I am saying the journalist who leaked those e-mails from that list should be.
An e-list like that one is a smoky back room where cronies can let their hair down and say what is on their minds.
Breaking the integrity of that list by posting was is private to the list is screwed up.
Hell, even when I have signed onto e-lists of racists and Nazis for doing "hatewatch", I would never publish publicly what was being said on those lists.
When a journalist spits in the face of another fellow journalist with that kind of betrayal it is unacceptable.
Posted by: Spock | June 25, 2010 at 06:42 PM
Weigel should have known better than to take the Post gig. The Washington Independent is infinitely better. I suppose more money or greater exposure with the promise of more money compelled him. I bet Ezra Klein himself will go soon.
Posted by: Joel Rutstein | June 25, 2010 at 08:17 PM
I'm glad he failed.
Posted by: Lloyd the Idiot | June 25, 2010 at 10:34 PM
I'm outraged that somebody actually has to take responsibility for their own words.
Accountability. It's a good thing.
Posted by: SouthsideCentral | June 25, 2010 at 10:46 PM
Way to stay classy, Ben.
Posted by: Virginians4Bob | June 26, 2010 at 07:10 AM
Excellent! Another pithy post demonstrating good manners and restraint. And here I have been under the mistaken impression that only the Tea Party crowd was spittle flinging angry. heh heh - I wonder from whom I could have gotten such a false image?
Schadenfreude, they name is Dave Weigel and "Not Larry Sabato".
Heh heh
Posted by: NotOnJournolist | June 26, 2010 at 07:25 AM
Wonkette called you a slave to WaPo. Any comment Ben?
Posted by: Princeton | June 27, 2010 at 04:35 PM
Basically true, Princeton. :-)
Posted by: Not Larry Sabato | June 27, 2010 at 05:05 PM
We are really going to have to figure out, as a country, what the word "privacy" means -- professionally, morally, legally, etc. Of course, by the time we do that, we may be speaking of it in purely nostalgic terms.
Posted by: Gretchen Laskas | June 27, 2010 at 05:51 PM
Gretchen, I don't disagree with you, but if self-proclaimed champions of free speech like the WaPo want to contribute positively in the meantime, they can courageously stand behind professionals whose personal opinions, especially when obviously not seriously given, ought not to necessarily have anything to do with judging their ability to do their jobs.
Posted by: Joel Rutstein | June 27, 2010 at 06:39 PM
The Washington Post nowadays believes in free speech only when the views of the Graham family or Fred Hiatt are being expressed.
Posted by: TomPaine | June 27, 2010 at 08:32 PM
TomPaine,
What does any of this have to do with free speech? Whose free speech has been infringed?
Posted by: notben | June 28, 2010 at 08:32 AM
Free speech is an important topic, but only one factor (in my mind) regarding the bigger issue of privacy, and what it means to us as Americans.
Posted by: Gretchen Laskas | June 28, 2010 at 11:12 AM
Not Ben:
Nothing and no one!
This has nothing to do with the First Amendment, but it has something to do with how the Washington Post handles its former reputation as a paper of record. Even its omsbudsmen (and women) have been compromised in recent years.
Its reputation for "fair and balanced" news is nearly as compromised as that of the Murdock media.
Posted by: TomPaine | June 29, 2010 at 10:14 PM
In this era of blog ,we easily get nice & updated information for research purposes... I'd definitely appreciate the work of the said blog owner... Thanks!
Posted by: Alpha male | September 08, 2010 at 03:34 AM
Good post. Very impressive writing. Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: cheap android tablet | July 22, 2011 at 10:41 AM
Thanks for your share,thanks a lot.Good luck!
Posted by: cheap jewelry | August 25, 2011 at 05:12 AM
Thanks for your share,thanks a lot.Good luck!
Posted by: replica jewelry | August 26, 2011 at 05:10 AM
i just didn't want a kindle at first, but after receiving one for christmas i'm completely converted. It offer genuine benefits over a book,
and makes it so much more convenient. i would definitely recommend this item:
Posted by: cheap air max | October 06, 2011 at 03:43 AM