« I Had Never Heard Of This Issue Before... | Main | So Excited.... Rolling Out Soon... »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b13369e201348693fe36970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference He is NOT a Federal Judge:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
That's a really amateurish mistake.
Posted by: Brian W. Schoeneman | August 31, 2010 at 08:01 AM
Wow and the article even reads:
"One such important action came in an Albemarle County courtroom, where ***Circuit Court Judge Paul M. Peatross Jr.*** put a damper on a pernicious fishing expedition by Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli II (R)"
Do they even read what they write?
Posted by: Spock | August 31, 2010 at 08:27 AM
The Editorial Board often has views I agree with, but they don't even do basic research of facts with Virginia issues they write about. I don't know if this is also an issue in MD and DC also or not.
Posted by: Not Larry Sabato | August 31, 2010 at 08:37 AM
Fred Hiatt strikes again.
When is the Graham family going to give him the gold watch?
Posted by: martinlomasney | August 31, 2010 at 08:48 AM
Again, as I pointed out in my prior comment, let's put this into the corporate context, and imagine an exchange of emails by corporate employees similar to what was leaked from the East Anglia Climate Research Unit. I don't think the Post's editors would be quite as sanguine about a judge quashing an investigative subpoena. This also isn't a molehill issue. As described in the article I linked to, the "trick" regarding the climate data allowed the the "hockey stick" to appear, which was a media sensation and drove tremendous funding for Mann et al including taxpayer-provided grants. This matter is squarely within the AG's authority to investigate under FATA.
http://notlarrysabato.typepad.com/doh/2010/08/cuccinelli-global-warming-suit-thrown-out.html?cid=6a00d83451b13369e20133f36bb1c7970b#comment-6a00d83451b13369e20133f36bb1c7970b
Also, I don't think the judge's ruling on the four federal grants will stand. Violations of FATA include knowingly presenting false or fraudulent claims for payment or approval to the Commonwealth. There is no caveat that the funds have to be from the Commonwealth. Certainly, it would be consistent with the purpose of FATA (stop fraud) to extend its coverage to approvals of payments of federal-provided dollars by Commonwealth universities.
Posted by: Chubber | August 31, 2010 at 09:45 AM
Interesting article at WUWT on new research involving the debunked hockey stick:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/08/30/breaking-new-paper-makes-a-hockey-sticky-wicket-of-mann-et-al-99/
In addition, also WUWT, independent review trashes IPCC practices:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/08/30/iac-slams-ipcc-process-suggests-removal-of-top-officials/
The Post is just following dogma by continuing to refer to the leaked emails as "stolen", as if that justifies ignoring the damning contents.
Posted by: Barbara Munsey | August 31, 2010 at 11:48 AM
The Post makes plenty of mistakes, but as I read the editorial on-line a few minutes ago, it didn't refer to the judge as a Federal judge. He appears to be sitting by designation as a Circuit Court judge for the Albemarle County Circuit Court.
Posted by: Whitney Wilson | August 31, 2010 at 02:38 PM
The reference to the Judge being a federal Judge was in the title.
That reference has now been removed, and has disappeared down the memory hole.
Posted by: reston libertarian | August 31, 2010 at 05:16 PM
Ask Bill Turque what happens when you anger The Board.
Posted by: Not Fred Hiatt | August 31, 2010 at 06:13 PM