Deal With It Eric

Cantor gets the first "pants on fire" award from the Politifact-Virginia website.

View this photo

Comments

[Spock]

Wow, Cantor's thugs go Rand Paultard on the opposition and now this?

Why is this dirtbag in office?

[yoyoyo]

He is a dirtbag - throw him away!

[yoyoyo]

I don't understand how the RTD can endorse the dude. He has no values. He isn't a conservative or a liberal - he's a straight up partisan hack. The only justification is that he will be Majority Leader, but what good does that do the people of the 7th or the Commonwealth of Virginia?

[Wolfwood]

You know when I selected the "Bill Me Later" option on my magazine subscription? According to NLS and Polifact, I didn't spend anything! Go me!

[SE VA MWC Alum]

Congress does not declare war. . . .or something like that. Cantor, what do you do with a fellow like that

[VAPolitico]

Did you read the article, Wolfwood? It actually addresses your idiotic point...

[Not Hussein (formerly Not Ben)]

Yoyoyo, you "don't understand how the RTD can endorse the dude"? Really?

He has an R next to his name, an effeminate faux Southern drawl, and his very existence gives credence to the idea that maybe Mr. Darwin's theory doesn't apply universally. In other words, he's prime RTD endorsement material.

[Wolfwood]

Is there more to your comment, VAPolitico, or do you just not know how to use punctuation?

I suggest that you end it with "...because the Democrats clearly have not been spending like drunken sailors, which was the point of what Eric Cantor was saying."

See? We can cooperate!

[VAPolitico]

Wolfwood, if I'm reading your first comment correctly, you are sarcastically saying that buying now and paying later is ok! You are making that point, I'm assuming to show how the Dems are pretending not to spend by putting the costs somewhere down the road.
The reason I ask if you read the article is that the site addressed specifically that incorrect point. Even if you add up all the future costs of Dem plans, they still aren't anywhere near more than the country has spent in the last 200 years combined, which was Cantor's assertion.
If that's not the point your comment was trying to make, then I have no idea what you were trying to say.

[yoyoyo]

lol@Hussein

[Supra skytop]

Good point, very insightful

[supra shoes]

I love you post!!

[Devremülk]

i like to read your posts. thanks for this one.

[Air Jordan 3]

The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on Earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but only to have the law of nature for his rule. Do you agree?

[cheap jewelry]

Thanks for your share,thanks a lot.Good luck!