« Donald McEachin Makes Some History | Main | BRIAN MORAN BEGS FCDC FOR HIS JOB »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b13369e20162fcb9d41b970d
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Liberty Allows Guns On Campus:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Hey Ben,
Don't you remember the whole "guns in bars" and how you predicted that would end in a drunken bloodbath? CWP holders have a lower incident of violent crime than even police officers! The only people who will be carrying guns now on Liberty's campus that weren't before are those who have enough respect for rules and regulations that they obeyed a ban when they likely would not have been caught anyway (how do you know what i have under my shirt?). These are not the people you need to be concerned about.
Posted by: Brian | November 22, 2011 at 08:28 AM
Let's face it: Ben knows something about "incredibly stupid." He lives it every day! Speaking of which, how is Janet Oleszek doing?
Posted by: Noticed | November 22, 2011 at 08:33 AM
I’ll bet the Brady folks will offer a bill that bans the right of a private school to do this…in keeping with their long-held love affair with controlling your life in every respect.
Posted by: Ghost of RWR | November 22, 2011 at 09:23 AM
Wait until the General Assembly session convenes and then we'll see which side wants to control our lives in every respect.
Posted by: Ralph | November 22, 2011 at 09:40 AM
Agreed with Ralph. Taliban bob has already introduced a personhood amendment. Will Dick Black who claimed to be all about jobs during the campaign against Shawn Mitchell be far behind in trying to control womens' uteruses and access to contraception and stem cell research?
Posted by: just the facts | November 22, 2011 at 09:47 AM
Brian. Yeah I really want inebriated people packing heat around bars. Remember Plexicoe Burris? Shot himself in the foot in a bar. If you allow idiots to do dangerous and idiotic things like pack heat under the influence it is just a matter of time till bad things happen.
Posted by: just the facts | November 22, 2011 at 09:52 AM
Yes, VA CCP holders who have been fingerprinted, and undergone local, state, and federal background checks are permitted to carry firearms on campus. How many more hoops would you prefer a law-abiding citizen jump through before being permitted to exercise a constitutional right?
Posted by: Reggie | November 22, 2011 at 11:39 AM
Plaxico broke the law. A legal CCP holder would not be breaking the law (and probably would have a better idea of how the machinery works than Plaxico . . . but I love what he's doing for the J-E-T-S.
Posted by: Jus Sayin' | November 22, 2011 at 11:45 AM
Look at what happened at the Appalachian School of Law when a student started shooting and there was a gun available to stop it.
Posted by: Tucker Watkins | November 22, 2011 at 12:32 PM
This is a smart move by Liberty! I bet the students at Virginia Tech wish that there had been more armed (law abiding) students that could have defended themselves a few years back.
Posted by: A Voter | November 22, 2011 at 12:36 PM
just the facts. I'm going to copy/paste what I said in Ben's "Guns in Bars" blog. No one answered the question, and I just have a hard time understanding why libs who are able to use facts and numbers to support their arguments in most situations completely avoid them when it comes to firearms and resort to appeals to fear like "I really want inebriated people packing heat".
---
Is one negligent discharge (the gun went off in his pocket, he didn't pick a fight a shoot someone because he was drunk) enough to justify the "wild west" and "bloodbath" rhetoric of gun-control advocates? What about 2 incidents? What about 1-2 a year? What other things should we outlaw if 1-2 idiots (a very high estimate for the current topic we are discussing) a year decide to break the law?
Posted by: Brian | November 22, 2011 at 01:46 PM
just the facts. I quoted the wrong part of your post. Your appeal to fear was "it is just a matter of time till bad things happen." But will you apply that same logic to paroled prisoners who commit another crime, or someone abusing a our social welfare system?
Posted by: Brian | November 22, 2011 at 01:55 PM
My main concern with allowing guns on campus is the fact that people are drunk all the time and are more likely to make stupid mistakes. At Liberty, this isn't an issue.
Posted by: Matt | November 22, 2011 at 01:58 PM
Hey, anyone hear about the dude who shot himself in the Spotsylvania County grocery store parking lot last week? This highly-skilled CWP holder was reaching for his seat belt and mistook his pistol trigger for the belt release! Put a round into his hip and bled out in front of his kids!
Google "man accidentally shoots self" - send any one of the hundreds of tragic news stories to our little buddies over at the NRA:
armedcitizen@nrahq.org.
They're always looking for stories about Armed Citizens in action!
Posted by: Bubby Hussein, Hillbilly Sheikh | November 22, 2011 at 02:39 PM
Smart move by Liberty. Banning guns always makes people safer, right? Because, of course, people who are going to commit gun violence would never break a rule about carrying a gun where they're not allowed to.
How'd the gun ban work out at Va Tech?
Posted by: Valley Indie | November 22, 2011 at 03:25 PM
Absent a controlled experiment, equal comparison & accurate data, (e.g., 10 colleges w/ CWP's allowed, 10 w/o) you really need to rely on common sense, political beliefs aside. Sure, the killing would have been reduced at Tech if any one of those students had a weapon.....hell, it probably wouldn't have happened at all if the perp knew that others may have easy access to weapons. That being said....and think about this a minute....how many of those alcohol/weed fueled pissing contests that you got into while in college would have ended differently if you or the other guy had a gun?
Posted by: Not Einstien | November 22, 2011 at 05:35 PM
Guns weren't banned at Va Tech, they were just in the hands of cops chasing phantom suspects for two hours, or hiding behind trees outside Norris Hall...while 30 more people were shot.
Posted by: Bubby Hussein, Hillbilly Sheikh | November 22, 2011 at 06:04 PM
Not Einstein -- that's the same argument put forward by every gun grabber anytime bans are discussed. Funny thing though, those kinds of incidents just don't happen in "shall issue" states like Va.
Hey, how 'bout that.
Posted by: Not Bubby | November 22, 2011 at 06:22 PM
If Liberty students want to kill each other, I say let them.
Posted by: NotJohnSMosby | November 22, 2011 at 07:00 PM
Once again NJSMosby renders ample evidence of why no one should breed from him…you are beyond pathetic. Have your point that you don’t like the policy. Fine. But even in humor to suggest people would be fine with kids killing each other is unspeakably stupid and despicable. Ben should remove it. But probably won’t.
Posted by: Ghost of RWR | November 22, 2011 at 07:28 PM
NJSM shows again that s/he/it is a mouth-breathing moron.
Posted by: Not Bubby | November 22, 2011 at 08:19 PM
Aw...Not John S Mosby is the ultimate liberterian.
Posted by: Grover Numbquist | November 22, 2011 at 08:38 PM
Funny, but it's been allowed at Hampden-Sydney for as long as I've been aware of it. The last murder recorded there was in the early 1800s.
Posted by: James Young | November 22, 2011 at 09:15 PM
Sorry Jimbo, you are wrong AGAIN! No gun carry at Hampden-Sydney brother.
http://www.hsc.edu/Student-Life/Handbook-The-Key/Appendices-of-Justice-System/Firearms.html
Posted by: Bubby Hussein, Hillbilly Sheikh | November 23, 2011 at 11:55 AM
Bubby must not have much experience at H-SC. Anyone who has spent any time there at all knows that concealed carry is permitted. There is also an extensive locker system that contains the largest private armory in the Commonwealth, all owned by the students.
H-SC is extremely gun friendly.
Posted by: Valley Indie | November 23, 2011 at 03:41 PM
I suspect that campus gun bans, and carry bans, in public colleges will soon be a thing of the past. It simply cannot pass constitutional muster than one must relinquish one's rights to attend college.
Posted by: Jack | November 23, 2011 at 04:35 PM
As an interesting aside, the real John Singleton Mosby, while a student at UVa, was not bothered by any CWP ; he shot a fellow student & spent about 6 months in jail awaiting trail.
Posted by: Not Einstien | November 23, 2011 at 06:01 PM
Yes, but he DID shoot in self-defense.
Posted by: Jack | November 25, 2011 at 07:38 AM
Ghost,
Who are you to lecture people on taste? You who think any scent of government trying to give disadvantaged people a hand up or barring abusive or discrimatory treatment of others smacks of socialism or a nanny state and would rather people wallow in poverty than that the well off invest sure we have an infrastructure and workforce of tomorrow that keeps us competitive.../.
And btw, where were you in complaining about taste when Caren Merrick lied to the brother of a Virginia Tech victim about her position on gun registration? And then releasing her NRA survey indicating that so close to the election she couldn't be called on it? That's pretty despicable, wouldn't you say?
Posted by: just the facts | November 25, 2011 at 02:01 PM
Brian,
I provided evidence. You hear quite frequently about intended discharges of weapons leading to people shooting themselves or incidents where the wife or girlfriend gets shot or assaulted by a drunk man who is carrying a weapon. We really want to tempt fate by making this legal? That's not an appeal to fear... that's an appeal to LOGIC!
Posted by: just the facts | November 25, 2011 at 02:05 PM
A Voter,
I bet not. You know Keith Fimian's assertion that everyone carrying weapons at Tech would have avoided this cost him his bid at a congressional seat against Gerry Connelly. WaPo documented that even GOP aligned mothers in Fairfax couldnt bring themselves to pull that level after he proposed making Tech into the Wild Wild West
Posted by: just the facts | November 25, 2011 at 02:07 PM
I encourage Liberty to set aside a designated dueling ground, so that if a disagreement between two or hopefully more students erupts, they can handle the issue just like they did in Old Virginny. Since Republicans are so set on turning the clock back to the 19th century, I say, go for it.
Posted by: NotJohnSMosby | November 26, 2011 at 07:44 AM
No offense, but if there's a facebook like button, it'll be much easier for me to share.
Posted by: Elliptical reviews | November 29, 2011 at 11:23 PM