Libby Garvey of Fairlington looks headed to a big win in the caucus to replace Barbara Favola on the Arlington County Board, while Newt Gingrich of McLean is surging to win the South Carolina primary for the GOP.
Results as they come in...
ARLINGTON UPDATE
Libby Garvey, 1915 votes, 44.4%
Melissa Bondi 966 votes, 22.4%
Terron Sims 922 votes, 21.4%
Kim Klingler 333 votes, 7.7%
Peter Fallon 178 votes, 4.1%
Good
Posted by: TGEoA | January 21, 2012 at 06:59 PM
awww shit, I forgot to vote :-/
Posted by: Spock | January 21, 2012 at 07:30 PM
But, I like Libby, so that'd cool!
Posted by: Spock | January 21, 2012 at 07:31 PM
Newt. Gingrich.
LOL
Posted by: RichmondDem | January 21, 2012 at 08:07 PM
I'm disappointed that we won't get any more hilarious Kim Klingler ads.
Posted by: Joecosystem | January 21, 2012 at 08:09 PM
Hey knock it off about Kim. She ran, voters made their call. We need more female candidates for office,NOT less!
Posted by: just the facts | January 21, 2012 at 09:19 PM
So 60% female isn't enough?
Posted by: TGEoA | January 21, 2012 at 09:27 PM
What I've had enough of is Sexist badgering of female candidates....
Posted by: just the facts | January 21, 2012 at 10:24 PM
Aren't ALL of the candidates who run for Arlington County office by definition inside-the-beltway candidates?
Posted by: Clarification | January 21, 2012 at 10:46 PM
I can live with Libby. But what I care about is this: The politics of personal destruction failed. Frank O'Leary's candidate came in third.
Posted by: Not Frank O'Leary | January 21, 2012 at 11:20 PM
Agreed with Not Frank O'Leary.... Glad the politics of personal destruction failed. And actually, Melissa Bondi still defeated O'Leary's candidate....
Posted by: just the facts | January 21, 2012 at 11:37 PM
Sims almost edged Bondi with a much smaller war chest. Not too bad. He's not going anywhere and will try again. Hopefully he will primary Zimmie.
Posted by: TGEoA | January 21, 2012 at 11:38 PM
Kim being a moron and a bad candidate has nothing to do with her being female, it as to do with her being a moron and a bad candidate.
Posted by: Spock | January 22, 2012 at 12:11 AM
Good thing this wasn't a mandate on the politics of pet projects and Chris Zimmerman... oh wait. Maybe it was.
Posted by: Harry | January 22, 2012 at 12:50 AM
TGEoA said "Hopefully he will primary Zimmie."
Only if Sims wants to be punished by the Democratic establishment for the rest of his political life. Ask Christian Dorsey...
Posted by: Arturo | January 22, 2012 at 09:09 AM
Too late, Arturo, Sims is done. If he wants to be an elected official so bad (remember his quixotic school board run a few years ago?) he better move to another county. His team went negative and failed. If you are gonna go
negative in Arlington you better win. Ask Jaime about that.
Posted by: Not Frank O'Leary | January 22, 2012 at 11:24 AM
TGEoA -- enjoying your career as a political hatchet person? You are quite talented at bashing people without discussing the substantive merits of the candidates you support.
Posted by: just the facts | January 22, 2012 at 11:26 AM
Seems like the only people who are negative are ones bashing O'Leary -- who wasn't in the race.
Voting at the W-L High School was ironic. That place is a palace. And for what is a mediocre school system. Well, that is what happens when all smart kids go to TJ.
I've love to say this was an anti-Zimmie vote, but in reality Bondi was just a very weak candidate.
Posted by: charlie | January 22, 2012 at 11:34 AM
O'Leary put himself in the race as Sims's hatchet man. Given his position and history is perfectly appropriate to comment on his ethics or lack thereof.
Posted by: Not Frank O'Leary | January 22, 2012 at 12:08 PM
In multi-candidate intra-party nominating contests, isn't it often the case that the candidate who "goes strongly negative" against one of the other candidates ends up destroying the target, but also him/herself at the same time?
Posted by: West End Observer | January 22, 2012 at 12:25 PM
Charlie, Arlington public school's are consistently ranked as one of the best school systems in the country. As for that place being a palace, the school board worked overtime to save money on that project, ending up with over $29 million in savings over what the county board had appropriated.
Posted by: Harry | January 22, 2012 at 07:40 PM
Lol… 29 million under what they “appropriated” equals a great “savings”…
Exactly the kind of thinking people are tired of…. Typical liberal-think…
My wife just came home from shopping, told me she spent 500 dollars but it was less than the 1000 dollars she wanted to spend…. She saved me 500… and I “owe” her that next shopping spree… lmao….
Only in liberal America…
Posted by: Change | January 22, 2012 at 08:30 PM