At least $3,000,000,000 (BILLION) was just cut from education over the next 10 years, with perhaps as much as a $1,000,000,000 (BILLION) a year cut coming soon after that.
This stuff is very complex so let me explain what happened.
Right now for every $200 that goes into the "general fund" (which covers education, medicaid, public safety and most everything else that the state government does besides transportation), $1 is taken out to add into the transportation budget.
Under the plan passed by the General Assembly today, that $1 for every $200 will be increased to $1.35 for every $200 going to transportation from the general fund. Sounds reasonable, it's only $0.35 on every $200.
Keep in mind this funding is in addition to transportation taxes, not the total funding source.
This money all comes from the general fund. Here's what is in the general fund as explained very simply by Dave Albo yesterday:
50% goes to education
25% to medicaid
15% to public safety
10% to everything else (including car tax)
As Albo noted in his floor speech, you can't touch the 25% that goes to medicaid because we are already at the federal minimum for coverage. We will continue to be at the federal minimum after the medicaid compromise this weekend (if it even holds up to the coming court challenge)- but that floor will be higher thanks to Obamacare.
But here's the catch. Obamacare doesn't pay for all of medicaid. It just pays 100% of the cost of the new people being added to the medicaid program, and only for a few years, then the feds propose picking up 90% of the cost.
With health care costs continuing to grow faster than the economy as a whole, the percentage of the general fund spent on medicaid would go up even without expanded coverage- but will go up even more when the state has to begin picking up 10% of the bill on the newly covered.
Meanwhile, the 15% of the general fund spent on public safety is a rising cost also. George Allen's legislation to "abolish parole" has led to this area of the budget increasing as more people are locked up in prison for longer periods of time. In addition the General Assembly passes new felonies every year- rarely eliminating any- all of which cost money to keep people in prisons longer.
So public safety's budget will continue to expand, especially with costs associated with the health care of an aging population in prison.
As Albo noted, once you take out education (50%), medicaid (25%) and public safety (15%) only 10% of the general fund budget covers "everything else" in state government. That even includes things like the car tax rebate which is not going to be eliminated.
So guess what gets hit as public safety needs more money, as medicaid needs more money? Education.
Now on top of all of those exisiting problems- legislators are taking even more money from the general fund for transportation- once again hitting education! How much? An additional $200,000,000 (MILLION) cut from education is what is being estimated to be raised in the first year by moving the transportation pull from 0.5% to 0.675% of the general fund.
That's $1,000,000,000 (BILLION) in the first five years cut from education.
But the general fund is funded from taxes that grow with economic growth like the sales tax. So this transportation bill will strip even more money that was available for education as the economy grows. Every year it will take even more.
If the economy grows at a similar pace as it did from 1985 until 2000, this $200,000,000 (MILLION) a year from education could be up to $1,000,000,000 (BILLION) a *year* taken from education by 2028.
Don't misunderstand what just happened. Your schools just got blasted with cuts in order to widen some roads.
This doesn't affect Fairfax, Loudoun, Arlington, Alexandria, Falls Church and Fairfax City much since those school systems get the minimum payout from the state. It affects Prince William a bit more. It really impacts "the real Virginia" where a lot of those counties get almost all of their school funding from the state.
So, I say lets repave and widen some roads in Fairfax, and let "the real Virginia" pay a fairer share of their school budgets.
Posted by: notjohnsmosby | February 23, 2013 at 11:07 PM
It impacts everyone, but you are absolutely correct that because of the composite index it hits poorer and more rural school divisions harder. I'm not in favor of punishing those kids because of the way their communities vote, we need to fight hard for them since their Delegates won't do so.
Posted by: notlarrysabato | February 23, 2013 at 11:50 PM
I used to think that way, but no more. I've grown to believe that subsidizing Republicans who then attack Democrats is unacceptable. The hypocrisy of teabaggers screaming "too much government" while having their public schools, Medicaid patients and everything else mostly paid for by tax dollars from NoVA is too much for me. Let them start paying a little more for their own needs, since they scream that we should always do that.
Posted by: notjohnsmosby | February 24, 2013 at 10:21 AM
Probably because I have so many ties to WV, what I see happening is that we end up with the Two Virginias that some in Richmond are talking about. The Republican delegates downstate who rob Northern Virginia to pay for their schools aren't going to raise their taxes, they will simply short change their own children. Their communities will see an ever increasing number of young people fleeing the community, which means the voting bloc will become even more intransigent towards education, which will create a self-defeating cycle that will impoverish those areas even more. Even ambitious, smart, and talent students will find it harder and harder to break out.
I'm happy sending some of my tax dollars elsewhere if I can keep that from happening. Because once upon a time, it was people like me sending tax dollars like mine to people like my father, who managed to get out. He, in turn, set the stage for raising me. I see it as fair's fair.
Posted by: Gretchenmlaskas | February 24, 2013 at 02:00 PM
Couldn't agree more Gretchen.
Posted by: notlarrysabato | February 24, 2013 at 02:37 PM
I'm not saying don't subsidize, but the current structure is completely unfair to NoVA. For a party that calls us "takers" while they're "givers and producers", then sits back and relies on us for their funding has resulted in the current situation. While I'm somewhat sympathetic to rural areas, I'm no longer sympathetic enough to overcome my thoughts on our crumbling roads, 300% increases in tolls on the Dulles Toll Road and an ever-worsening traffic nightmare. Especially when they not only admit that we're funding them, but then pass social policy laws that negatively impact us.
We're basically paying for the bad guys to continue doing bad things to us. It's unacceptable.
Posted by: notjohnsmosby | February 24, 2013 at 04:35 PM
NJSM, who are you kidding? It's not as if any of this is "your" money.
Get your EIC refund check from federal daddy warbucks yet?
Posted by: Not Bubby | February 25, 2013 at 11:49 PM
I ended up paying $9,834.00 in state income taxes in 2011. It will be a few a bit over $10,100 for 2012, after a small refund of a couple hundred bucks comes back after I file my tax returns.
How much did you pay in Virginia income taxes in 2011?
Posted by: notjohnsmosby | February 26, 2013 at 05:34 PM
Oh yeah, those numbers are undoubtedly legit. You're just a model of credibility.
Posted by: Not Bubby | February 27, 2013 at 12:03 AM
Thank you for agreeing.
Now, about the GIANT REPUBLICAN TAX INCREASE, what are all the teabaggers going to do with themselves?
Posted by: notjohnsmosby | February 27, 2013 at 11:18 AM