« International Incident At Connolly Event | Main | 7th Annual NLS Bracket Challenge »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b13369e2017d421aea8f970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Republican Attorney General Candidates Involved In Cover Up?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Mshapiro612

Not that I doubt you, but where does Federal Law outline the value of data for in-kind purposes? I give free info to campaigns when I can and have gotten permission from previous clients, but I never realized that had to be considered an in-kind donation. Though I do know communications made at the behest of another campaign using that campaigns lists have to be counted as a donation equal to the cost of the communication.

Paul Prados

Presuming all of this story is true:

For it to be misprision, they would have to know the value of the item stolen met the terms of felony larceny. You make the leap and say that there are "tens of thousands of dollars of data" on the SIM card.

It sounds like an idiot stole a phone, was caught and fired, and the phone was returned.

Misprision has three "i"s it is "misprision."

notlarrysabato

Mshapiro- The FEC actually has a cost system you have to use similar to the way the IRS calculates miles driven on taxes. For example, an email list of donors is assigned one cost, while email volunteers are a lower cost, and generic email addresses and the lowest cost. I will try to dig up the training docs somewhere and send them to you on email.

notlarrysabato

Paul- I think the line is $200 in Virginia. No question Bell thinks his data is worth $200, right?

Jerelwilmore

Assuming the facts are as you have reported them, it would be interesting to know what they told the police after they decided not to report the employee who took the phone.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obstruction_of_Justice

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessory_after_the_fact

Spock

*making popcorn*

notlarrysabato

JerelWilmore-

They did tell the police that night about the phone (hence the police report). They did not inform the police of the value of the phone, allowing the police to mistakenly think it was a misty- when in fact it should have been charged as a felony. Hence they dropped the issue.

David Rogers

I think you are confusing "misprision of a felony" with a plea bargain.

Jerelwilmore

But did they tell the police they'd caught the person who did it and give that person's identity to the police?

That's what makes this scenario so interesting: they did call the police in. The question is, what did they tell the police in order to get them to go away without arresting anyone, and did they break any laws in the process?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

BlogAds

NLS Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Facebook Fan Page

    SiteMeter

    Blog powered by Typepad